The last post was published on 12th April 2019, around six months back. Let’s continue our expedition to find more lies written by AV. 134 lies have been detected so far in his one article.
There’ve been many articles written about the visit to Mecca by Guru Nanak Dev ji. Many Muslims declined that because they believe the centre point of their religion can’t be moved by anyone. Anyway, the Sikh History proves the moving of Kabaa. My point of writing this is that AV points to some author who tried to prove the first guru as a Muslim. This is a very strange and laughable matter to me, people from all over the world, from different cultures and religions, trying to have the guru on their sides without even following his teachings. Muslims as well as Hindus are blind when they pull the guru towards them rather than going to the guru to learn something.
AV did the same. He said that the guru went to Mecca to accompany his friend, who he meant was Bhai Mardana ji. He said the guru didn’t circle around the Kabaa like the Muslims do, neither is it written anywhere. The point here is he blatantly accepted and rejected anything that is against or according to his claims. Then why in here he is saying it didn’t happen because it’s not mentioned anywhere. Suppose, if it’d been mentioned in some book, he would have rejected it right away by saying ‘work of Rothschild.’
So by using this method of finding the truth, AV is always in a win-win situation, because he neither gave the evidence to prove his point, nor bring the acceptable arguments to refute something. His blog is filled with Rothschild and Jews, and the stories that he finds amusable to entertain the readers. If the story is not mentioned in the books, he won; if it’s mentioned, then Rothschild changed it. This is how his whole blog works. If I am not wrong, then AV is nothing more than a person who spends half of his day on the Internet to search things and then manipulate them to misinform the public.
We’ve discussed some part of Singh Sabha Movement in the last post. I hate the article on AVB because of its unorganized way to tell the story. He should have split it in multiple parts or something and then try to write gibberish. He doesn’t even know the A of the Sikh Religion and he is writing the Sikh history. I can bet that his Google-search way really confused him as there’re many contradictions in his article.
I was wondering if this’s really his work, or the work of a Think Tank. If he’d really written everything by himself, then he would never have that many contradictions. It usually happens when a Think Tank does that without consulting with each other and going in random directions to confuse the masses. Like in the work of Kaala Afghana it’s very much clear that he didn’t write those books because 1) he didn’t know Punjabi but Urdu, 2) there’re many contradictions. So, similarly, this might be a work of Think Tank, or some team that AV is relying on. In any way, there’re lies in his articles.
One of the famous writers of Singh Sabha Movement was Giani Ditt Singh. He’s the editor of Khalsa Akhbar. The British had no role in starting that newsparper135. The reason being there’re many things that the newspaper was publishing, and it’s fined because of the article published in that. The help of the British wouldn’t have the newspaper fine for some article as it’s its own body to ‘propagate’ the Sikh religion according to how the ‘British wanted’ it to be.
King Abdur Rahman died in 1901136. How was he asked to remove the idols from the Sikh shrine in Kabul in 1905 then137? Was it the ghost of Abdur Rahman who was asked to do the work, like AV wrote about Baba Banda Singh present in the year 1717 A.D. after his martyrdom? Stupid fellow.
One more thing, the removal of the idols from Harmandir Sahib is said to happen in 1905, according to AV. Check the year when Abdur Rahman was allegedly asked by the British to remove the idols. AV didn’t care much about the years and history and wrote both the years same without much knowing the history. I will consider the removal of idols from the precincts of Harmandir Sahib in the year 1905 wrong. The idols were said to be removed by Giani Ditt Singh ji, and he left this world in 1901. So the initial work of removing the idols from the precincts of Darbar Sahib happened before 1905138.
AV’s writing is so dramatic and worse than the C-grade movies produced in India. All the nonsensical dialogues and immature content is really the work of a dimwit. Nobody can beat AV in that. Let me give you one example here. During the removal of the idols from the precincts of Harmandir Sahib, some Sikhs shouted the British was playing the game of ‘divide and rule.’ Give anything to fools (people who believe in the sham article of AV) and they will take it as ambrosial bliss.
I forgot to mention one thing in the earlier post where the non-Sikhs authors were talked about. According to AV, Max Arthur Macauliffe started writing the articles in 1870s. And he completed his six-book series in 1909. Following verses are worth mentioning as they’re in AV’s article.
Max baby planted FAKE verses from the mouths of Gurus and invented prophecies by them which anticipated the advent of the white race to whom the Sikhs would be loyal. And a topeewala white Sikh ( Hodson ) would avenge Tegh Bahadur.
Just before the first war of Independence in 1857 the British started doing rigorous propaganda of a FAKE prophesy among the followers of Guru Tegh Bahadur that they would attack Delhi with the help of white man and completely avenge the old insult.
I don’t think I’ve to decode it for you. It’s all there. But for the halfwits, let me explain.
It’s said that Macauliffe mentioned a prophecy in his book so that the Sikhs be loyal to the British. In the earlier passage, AV claimed the prophecy was started before 1857 so that the Sikhs be with the British against the rebellion act. Also, Macauliffe started writing his articles in 1870s. If we assume his first article was published on Jan 1st 1870, even then there’s a gap of nearly thirteen years. So who did the fake prophecy? Was it Macauliffe or the British before 1857? A contradiction? Well, if you’re an everyday reader of AVB, you would have got used to it.
The gurudwaras were not ‘taken over’139 by the Sikhs; they gave their lives to protect the sacrosanct religion of Guru Nanak Dev ji. Had the British had any role to push the Sikhs over to restore the Code of Conduct, there wouldn’t have been any fights between the Sikhs and British. The Mahant of Nankana Sahib had good relationships with the government; the Sikhs fought and got martyrdom. AV mentioned the control of the gurudwaras was taken by the British, so now the British would say, ‘hey, let’s fight each other. Don’t worry, we will help you out in the fighting with us. We can teach you how to take away the control of the gurudwaras from us.’ Go and read Chabia da Morcha.
Coming to the census in India now. According to the official website of Ministry of Home Affairs, GoI, the first labelled census in India was in 1872.
A systematic and modern population census, in its present form was conducted non synchronously between 1865 and 1872 in different parts of the country. This effort culminating in 1872 has been popularly labeled as the first population census of India However, the first synchronous census in India was held in 1881. Since then, censuses have been undertaken uninterruptedly once every ten year.
If the non-synchronous census has to be taken in the year 1865, then it’s the first time it’s ever conducted. So this should be the first time the religions were mentioned. It’s same for the Hindus and Muslims. Or was it before 1865, the name Hindu appeared in the census which didn’t exist at that time? One more point, AV’s year is also wrong. It should have been 1872, not 1871140, when the first popularly labelled census was conducted.
I hate it to write it again that the British had no role to start the Singh Sabhas141. And neither the work was manned by the ex-military people142. The first Singh Sabha started in Amritsar and its chief was Sardar Thakur Singh Sandawalia. He was not from military. The second was in Lahore, which had the main people Bhai Gurmukh Singh and Boota Singh. Neither of them was in military. They wore the badge of loyalty143, seriously? Even in these days, the patriotism, nationalism, or any other way which shows your loyalty to a nation or king is not shown in the gurudwaras. The main purpose of the places is to worship the One, connect with the One, and then achieve Oneness. Baseless allegations by the dimwit is so hard to read and believe, especially when he’s written so erroneously about almost everything that happened in the Sikh history.
None of them hated the Hindus or Muslims144. One of the works of Bhai Kahn Singh Nabha was the book Hum Hindu Nahi, which still gives nightmares to the BHs and SSs. Read that book. The dialogues between the Hindu and Sikh will show you if he hated the Hindus or not. Similar type of works is of Giani Ditt Singh. Read these two authors and you’ll realize that how AV is pushing the general public in a dark pit.
Many of the people take it as a hatred if a Sikh follows the True Path of Sikhi, or deny the worshipping of the Hindu gods. The Sikhs do not hate any Hindu or Muslim. They just want to tell the people that their religion is different and distinct so that the people who’re blindfolded can at least hear, if can’t see, that how the BHs and SSs are wrong. The BHs and SSs do not read much that is for sure.
One of the unpublished comments on our blog is this:
Well, All the gurus were Hindu and from hindu family. So, taz why they mentioned all avatars of vishnu and talked about the supreme god with different names shiv rama krishna narsingh etc even waheguru is also an another name of god. and they did worship hindu deities as well as they belong to all this... i did not read your entire post. but your explanation above made no sense at all
I bolded the line. Makes sense now? THEY DON’T READ.
Think a person is saying I’m going to give you money so that you can die according to his wish. Will that be useful to you in any way? Think of the Sikhs now who died protecting their gurudwaras, so intimidating them would never have worked; a person who’s not afraid of death can’t be intimidated. The Singh Sabha members were the people who’re very, very hard to manipulate. Think what Bhai Kahn Singh Nabha, Giani Ditt Singh, Bhai Vir Singh, and others have given us. Had they been manipulated like SSs they would never have achieved something that great and their names wouldn’t have been immortalized in the Sikh history. The lie of AV that it’s easy for the British to intimidate, bribe and manipulate the Sikh leaders to create a modern Sikhism145 is so foolish.
No new Sikhism was created by the British or the Singh Sabha Movements. The Sabha brought the Pureness back among the Sikhs which’s there during the time of the Sikh Gurus, and was lost because of the diluted explanations and rituals of the BHs.
Guru Nanak Dev ji never wore a tilak or Rudra Raksha maala around his neck146. In the earlier paintings though a tilak was shown, that has been because of the Puratan Janamsakhi where it’s written the guru wore a tilak. This work came into existence in the seventeenth century. Guru Nanak Dev ji in his own writing said these are of no use. So the guru would do something that he’s not agreeing to? Hmm.
ਗਲਿ ਮਾਲਾ ਤਿਲਕੁ ਲਿਲਾਟੰ ॥ ਦੁਇ ਧੋਤੀ ਬਸਤ੍ਰ ਕਪਾਟੰ ॥
ਜੇ ਜਾਣਸਿ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰ ਕਰਮੰ ॥ ਸਭਿ ਫੋਕਟ ਨਿਸਚਉ ਕਰਮੰ ॥ - ਅੰਗ ੪੭੦
The Singh Sabha didn’t create the pictures of the first guru like a Sufi saint147. It’s how the people from the different religions believe how the guru looked like. The Hindus want to see the guru with a tilak and a janeu; you will see the picture of that also, that’re taken as evidence to prove the guru was Hindu. The Sufis might have a different picture in their mind. If you look at the work of Malcolm – AV mentioned his name but didn’t read the book though – he started his chapter with the name Nanac Shah. That seems like a Muslim name. So it is how the people all over the world want the guru to be like, but the true form of the guru has been the same which’s neither Hindu nor Islamic in nature.
All knew that none of the Sikh Gurus were Hindu, nor they lived their lives according to the Hindu religion, and the tenth guru didn’t start Sikhism148. Like a child I’ve to tell these things again and again. You might have learned by now how this lie of the Sikh Gurus to be Hindu is perpetuated in AV’s article as I’ve to mention it almost every single time it comes. Not only this article, but also in other articles that AV’s written he used the same lame statements about the Sikh Gurus to change the myth into history.
The tenth guru didn’t trust only Banda Singh Bahadur149. Five Sikhs were sent with him. Banda asked the guru how he should live the life. The guru told him several things. One was if the Khalsa is your friend, think it like these’re my blessings. If you become egotistical, then it’ll be like how the gold melts because of the extreme heat.
Propagation of this erroneous claim that Banda was a Hindu or every victory was because he’s a Hindu has been going on for some time now. On Quora also, some halfwits have written answers like that, ignoring that it’s after his awakening after meeting the tenth guru that he became someone who got victorious.
Gurudwara Hemkunt Sahib was built in the 20th century. It was no Durga Mandir150. This dimwit and likes of his are changing everything into the Hindu temples. It’s not just Hemkunt Sahib, they’re also claiming Harmandir Sahib. Also, Taj Mahal. 😐 I really do not have any expectations from them. They’re nothing but jack.
Hemkunt Sahib’s history is related to the tenth guru. The guru meditated there on the One before coming into this world. He mentioned that in his writing in Bachitar Natak. It’s not the Goddess Durga151, wife of Shivji who’s worshipped.
The yajna performed by the guru is also famous among the masses of BHs and SSs for the wrong reasons. It’s supposed to happen on the hill of Naina. Not all the Sikh historical scriptures say the guru performed yajna152. Gur Sobha, Panth Parkash, and Twarikh Khalsa are three of them. There’re others also. Although there’s no denying that the incident is not mentioned in other historical scriptures. But remember AV said the British changed the history of the Sikhs? How can he trust this then? Couldn’t it have been that the British had ‘injected poison’ in those scripture to malign the Sikh history? Why didn’t he say that? This’s why I called earlier the win-win situation for AV. AV wanted to claim the guru worshipped some Hindu god, so he didn’t have to say Macauliffe or Rothschild here as the scriptures talk about them. Getting the point? One important matter that demolished his claims to be true is that he didn’t mention any of the scriptures where the story was talked about. He mentioned ‘throughout all Sikh historic texts’ but failed to provide one. Maybe Google-search didn’t help him this time. 😉
The guru had won the battle before this yajna was supposed to happen, so it’s never to win battles or as AV put it ‘before setting off to battle.’153
Anyway, the history of the yajna has already been written, so it’s better if you go and read. Don’t forget to read Devi Pujan Partaal.
Before the beginning of the Sikh Kingdom, several battles were fought between the Sikhs and the other parties. Harmandir Sahib was demolished and the sacred pool was levelled, there’s no water remaining154. It’s not the Hindus but the Sikhs that got martyred in the process and other battles155. This whole chest-thumping to showcase the paramount stupidity to glorify the non-existing stories of the Hindus in these matters is so sad and bovine. Hindus at least should be aware of these things. And it’s the Sikhs who built everything again156.
Think of this how stupid AV is. It’s a known fact that the Mughals or other forces destroyed so many Hindu temples and killed a number of people. They couldn’t protect their temples from them, but saved the gurudwaras? Seriously? In these days, where’re these Hindus and why aren’t they helping the Sikhs to build Gurudwara Gyan Godri Sahib, like they did for Harmandir Sahib?
How low the thinking of a person can be known from the fact that AV and his likes do not agree that the land of a gurudwara can be given by a Muslim. This century is filled with religion-hating people, who in some vague way always find a way to spread the misinformation among the people.
Anyway, Akbar visited Guru Amardas ji in Goindwal Sahib. The Mughal Emperors had a long history of visiting the Sikh Gurus for blessings, and it’s a known fact which can’t be ignored. But because of their atrocious acts, the battles also happened between them and the Sikh Gurus.
So Akbar gave the land to the guru when he visited him in Goindwal Sahib; it’s not ‘acquired free from Hindu Zamindars.’156 BHs and SSs have to realize one day that there’re other people on this planet who’re not Hindu and they’re good in many ways and they’ve their own original thoughts.
To show his incapacity to write about the Sikh Religion, AV mentioned in some other post that the fourth guru went to Akbar to ask for the land, contradicting his earlier statement. Wasn’t it the Hindu Zamindars like he said in this post?
GURU RAM DAS TOOK THE INITIATIVE TO ASK EMPEROR AKBAR FOR LAND TO DIG THE SAROVAR OF GOLDEN TEMPLE AT AMRITSAR IN 1577 .. THE ORIGINAL NAME OF AMRITSAR IS RAM DAS PUR..
A contradiction? Hmm.
Anyway, the initial name of Amritsar was Guru Ka Chak. The fourth guru, Guru Ramdas ji, started creating the sacred pool around Harmandir Sahib. It’s not the year 1574 AD when ‘golden temple’ was originally built157. The creation of sarovar started in 1574 AD (1631 BC). Creation of Harmandir Sahib started in 1588 AD (1645 BC). In 1604 AD (1661 BC), the first parkash of Guru Granth Sahib ji happened.
So Harmandir Sahib was built for what purpose? The disinformation is it’s for the praises of Vishnu as the name Har suggests. But the truth is it’s nothing to do with Vishnu. The initial parkash of Guru Granth Sahib in 1661 BC is proof enough to condemn the assumption of the Vishnu idol present in there during its initial build158. Shivji and Durga becomes arbitrary, so do their idols159, if the assumption is made that Harmandir is the House of Vishnu. During the initial construction of Harmandir Sahib, the words were even Vishnu couldn’t match the place like this. So praises of Vishnu, Vishnu Temple, Vishnu Idol, etc., they all become nonsensical in terms of history as well as philosophy.
Like I said in the beginning, the name of the place was Guru ka Chak. The sarovar’s name was not Vishnu Kund160. Later it was known as Ramdaspur, and now Amritsar.
The foundation stone of Harmandir Sahib was laid by Sai Miya Mir. As he’s happened to be a Muslim, so it naturally becomes a lie for AV161. The British didn’t remove any references of Vedas or anything in the Gurbani which is in today’s form, but AV definitely tried to remove all the references of Muslims in the Sikh history. From the first guru to the last guru, wherever the Muslims supported the Sikh Gurus and the Sikh causes, their existence has been tried to maligne with the propaganda of very high proportions. When you visit Harmandir Sahib, you can see the board where the name of Sai Miya Mir appeared. Also, there’s a different story which is that Guru Arjan Dev ji laid its founding stone. However, many Sikhs believe it’s Sai Miya Mir because it shows no hatred towards another religion, and the love and support for the similar beliefs.
Paramount negligence in terms of the religions is visible when AV says that the Sikh God is same as Brahman (not the person who reads Vedas but name of God) of Hinduism. God is same everywhere; it’s just how you see it. Like the Hindus see Vishnu as a form of God and worship him, suggesting they’re worshipping the One. In Christianity and Islam, God is beyond time and sight. I doubt if there’s any religion where God dies after few years. 😐
The bani of Chandi Charitar or Chandi di Vaar has nothing to do with the devotion of the guru to her162. It’s already been explained earlier. And in his own words, the guru said Waheguru created Durga to kill the demons. So the guru knows Durga is someone who’s created, so he would worship her instead of the Master who created her? Makes sense. But, yes, it’s true that these writings were created to instil a warlike spirit in the minds of the Sikhs. In the same granth, the guru talked about Kharag Singh and Krishna. Krishna fought with the character Kharag Singh, who you couldn’t find in the original book of Hindus; it’s specifically created by the tenth guru to show how Krishna, the one the Hindu praised and said to have so much power, lying spent on the ground after Kharag Singh vanquished him, even when Krishna had called Indra, Shivji, Ganesh, Varuna, etc., and their armies. Kharag Singh killed everyone, and the rest left the battlefield to save their lives. So the primarily form of Krishna, who’s Vishnu, the gurus praises, and the tenth guru showed him failing in the battle and running away? OK.
We’re talking about Guru Gobind Singh ji, but suddenly AV mentioned Guru Nanak Dev ji next. It’s so hard to go in one direction for him, especially when he doesn’t know what and how to write clearly.
Guru Nanak Dev ji didn’t remove his saintly attires in Kartarpur Sahib163. He removed the clothes of an udasi. Following are the words of Bhai Gurdas ji.
ਫਿਰਿ ਬਾਬਾ ਆਇਆ ਕਰਤਾਰ ਪੁਰਿ ਭੇਖੁ ਉਦਾਸੀ ਸਗਲ ਉਤਾਰਾ ।
ਪਹਿਰਿ ਸੰਸਾਰੀ ਕਪੜੇ ਮੰਜੀ ਬੈਠਿ ਕੀਆ ਅਵਤਾਰਾ । ਵਾਰ ੧, ਪਉੜੀ ੩੯
ਪਹਿਰਿ ਸੰਸਾਰੀ ਕਪੜੇ ਮੰਜੀ ਬੈਠਿ ਕੀਆ ਅਵਤਾਰਾ । ਵਾਰ ੧, ਪਉੜੀ ੩੯
The days of Baisakhi and Bandichhorh are very famous days in the Sikh history. Baisakhi was the day when the Khalsa Panth was created, and on Bandichhorh the sixth guru came back from incarceration. People are finding every way to link the Sikhs to Hindus. Like this dum-dum is suggesting the Sikhs changed these days related to Sikh Gurus when they’re related to the Hindus164. Nope, the Sikhs didn’t change it. Think of the numerous festivals around the world in different cultures and religions on these two days. Does it suggest that they copied it from Hinduism? These people need to come out of their superiority-complex racial behaviour. Go check 13th April and tell the world how all these events didn’t happen on that specific day; they were changed to 13th April because of the influence of Hinduism.
It’s a known fact that the Sikh Gurus were Khatri, but this doesn’t come under Vaishya165 but Chhatri. This is also taken as the gurus to be Hindu because these varnas are part of the Hindu society. The Sikh Gurus even defined these words. Like if we talk about Khalsa Panth, they are the Chhatri – not the Hindus but warriors. Similarly, the guru defined a true Khatri or Pandit or Brahmin in Gurbani.
One new argument that I’ve heard a lot is the name of the Sikh Gurus on the name of deities or Hindus. This becomes one of the most used argument on the Internet. In reality, they do not know the meaning of the words. I’ve said it several times and I’m tired of that. The name of the tenth guru had nothing to do with Krishna166, as we’ve seen how much the guru loved Krishna in his writing. And if the meaning of the word Gobind (the guru’s name) had been Krishna then the guru would have changed his name because his writing clearly gives a message that he didn’t believe in Krishna at all. Gobind is also the name of Waheguru; it means the Protector of Earth.
The creation of the Khalsa Panth didn’t happen to solely defend the Hindus or India167. It’s to fight against injustice. The ‘sole’-reason argument fails when we see the Hindu chiefs coming to fight with the guru. In his writing, the guru gave the clear message that he came on this earth to save saints and destroy the evil.
ਯਾਹੀ ਕਾਜ ਧਰਾ ਹਮ ਜਨਮੰ ॥ ਸਮਝਿ ਲੇਹੁ ਸਾਧੂ ਸਭ ਮਨਮੰ ॥
ਧਰਮ ਚਲਾਵਨ ਸੰਤ ਉਬਾਰਨ ॥ ਦੁਸਟ ਸਭਨ ਕੋ ਮੂਲ ਉਪਾਰਨਿ ॥੪੩॥ – ਬਚਿਤ੍ਰ ਨਾਟਕ
ਧਰਮ ਚਲਾਵਨ ਸੰਤ ਉਬਾਰਨ ॥ ਦੁਸਟ ਸਭਨ ਕੋ ਮੂਲ ਉਪਾਰਨਿ ॥੪੩॥ – ਬਚਿਤ੍ਰ ਨਾਟਕ
In the writings of the Sikh faith, numerous languages were used. The script was mainly Gurmukhi, but the words came from so many languages.
One person even said that the guru said not to read or write in Persian language or the language of Muslims. What he didn’t fathom is the fact that in the Sikh Gurus’ writing the Persian words also came. How the guru would have said not to write something in a language that they themselves used? Even in the Sikh Kingdom, the court language was Persian. This I had to tell you because our dimwit said because of the White Historians the words were replaced168, like Harmandir Sahib became Darbar Sahib and Islamic fatwa became Hukamnama. This 8-year-old doesn’t know that the Hukamnamas had been written by the Sikh Gurus for long and their handwritten are still available. One of them I’ve personally seen in Patiala during my visit to Punjab.
Secondly, Darbar is not an Urdu name but Persian169. And this word – Darbar – comes in Gurbani also. Like I mentioned, there’re so many languages used in Gurbani. Just go on the road of hatred and do all these dumb mistakes while writing.
The Sikh Gurus were so daring170 that the nincompoop like you would have pissed in your pants. Their lives, actions, and writings are primarily examples that they didn’t care when it comes to call a spade a spade. From the diluted rituals to discrimination in the Hindu as well as Muslim religions, they spoke about everything. In the heart of the Muslim and Hindu places, the guru stood and spoke against their practices. You’re talking about some idols in Harmandir Sahib? If they were present at the time of the Sikh Gurus, they would have thrown them away with their first sight. Idolatry has no place in Sikhism. For these reasons the Hindus are called blind in Gurbani. Anyway, just read Sikhs and the Hindu gods to deep dive in the topic.
The foolishness of AV’s article is conspicuous when he writes about the life of Baba Banda Singh Bahadur because he couldn’t write it synchronously according to the battles, and jump right into the deep pits that he’d dug himself to feel the comfort. He definitely knew about some places where the battles took place, which is easy to find on Google – the main source of his study. In the similar fashion, he talked about Gottlieb Wilhelm Leitner, whose name he would have gotten from Wikipedia. The reason being he mentioned about the college and an Urdu Muslim scholar by looking at Wikipedia. Following are the verses present on Wikipedia.
Three years later, sometime in 1864, he became Principal of Government College University (Lahore)
During this period he wrote a scholarly and comprehensive book in Urdu, History of Islam, in two volumes, with the help of an Urdu Muslim scholar, Maulvi Karim-ud-Din, who was at that time District Inspector of Schools in Amritsar, Punjab. These two volumes were later published in 1871 and 1876.
AV talked about Government College Lahore and Karim-ud-Din. These names he got from the Internet, the rest of the story he cooked himself. In every post, you will see the same pattern. Some names that existed in history, using those names to create his own version of history. Some names that never existed in history, using those names to create his own version of history. The Singh Sabha name was not coined by Leitner171, it’s Sikhs whose joined efforts created it because it’s the group of Singhs. Leitner didn’t give any Urdu titles172 to Sikhs with the help of Karim. More importantly, AV mentioned about the Singh Sabha members:
They all wore the badge of loyalty to the foreigner British and hatred for the Indian Hindus and Muslims
If they really hated the Muslims, why would they adopt the names given by a Muslim scholar? This can’t even be argued that they didn’t know different languages. We all know how well-read the Sikh scholars were at that time.
Anyway, Leitner’s work mainly revolves around Islam, and he wrote books on that also. Although he’s said to coin the term Dardistan.
Leitner had nothing to do with the Sikhs in the manners in which it’s written by AV. And the photo that AV posted to mislead the people is not connecting him to the Sikhs. Like in the case of Hodson he misrepresented the picture, similarly he did it here. It’s the copy of what’s available on Wikipedia, and this is written below the picture.
Leitner, at the age of 26, dressed in native costume whilst exploring Dardistan. Taken from the Strand Magazine, 1894.
So it’s not as if he wanted to appear as a Sikh. Just find out what Dardistan is to understand more.
The devotion of the Sikhs will always be to the granth, not a piece of land. They can definitely participate in the war or battle or join army. But their spiritual identity will always be there. You might have seen that in the Sikh Regiment. But also some ‘Sikhs’ like K. P. S. Gill are also there who did the killing of innocent in big proportions and rewarded by the governments. So ‘Sikhs’ like him might be aware of ‘bhakti is to the mother land.’ The real Sikhs do not even consider that. Gurbani calls them fools/donkeys who’re attached to the lands.
We’re back to the fake stories of the Sikh Gurus because AV’s article has no direction. The tenth guru created the Khalsa Panth to fight against injustice. He didn’t consider that only one son should be given for the Khalsa Panth173. The guru sacrificed his all sons over the Panth, and he would believe something different in return? Seriously? Doesn’t this scumbag know this story?
It’s true that the Khalsa Panth was not created based on birth. Anyone can join that. But, yes, Sikhism existed before Guru Gobind Singh ji174. Are you a nursery student that I’ve to explain everything to you? Come on, man … use some sense. How many times you’re going to repeat the same crap in just one article?
The Panth was not manned by the Hindus anyway. This dimwit would agree in the next paragraphs that the guru asked the head of a Sikh. Well, how would he ask the head of a Sikh if the Sikhs never existed before 1699 and the Panth was manned by the Hindus? This shows his lack of knowledge and consistency in the writing, as well as the propaganda.
Oh, come on, man, Sikhs do not want to join Hinduism or any other religion for that matter. If because of their lack of understanding they’re drawn to the propaganda, then it is their choice to make. The Hindus and Muslims are called blind and one-eyed for a reason. I’m happy to have my both eyes intact.
Like Banda Singh Bahadur, the Panj Pyaare were also called Hindus175 by this 8-year-old. Here is why AV is a wasted sperm. (Bolded the words)
The entire sangat is very dear to me; but is there a devoted Sikh who will give his head to me here and now? A need has arisen at this moment which calls for a head.
Daya Ram, a Hindu176 Khatri of Lahore, arose and offered himself.
The guru asked the head of a Sikh, who didn’t exist before 1699 according to AV, and then the Hindu gave his head? Of course, makes so much sense (sarcasm).
Tat Khalsa didn’t fudge anything related to the birth places of the Panj Pyaare177. And the thing is they’d been with the guru/Sikhi for long, it’s not like they just came from outside on that specific day and then offered the head. In the terms of AV, the guru was going to create a new religion, why someone would give up his own religion who’s very dear to him without even knowing the reason for that? Isn’t it idiotic to think they gave up on their earlier religion without knowing anything about what they’re going to get into and what practices would be performed? Only a person who trusts the guru would do that. Nobody would give up his head to someone if he doesn’t trust him. Moreover, if AV has to be believed then the guru started a new religion, how the Panj Pyaare would be Hindus if they’d joined the new religion?
You might argue that how something similar happened with Banda then. See, 1) the guru didn’t ask his head, 2) he had powers after spending some time with his order but he couldn’t achieve the high spiritual stage, the moment he met the guru awakened him, 3) he’d already heard the Singhs doing the jhatka at his place but still he joined the Panth, 4) and lastly he spent some time with the guru and the Sikhs.
In the case of the day of Baisakhi, these things didn’t happen. The words were sent by the guru to have the Sikhs available at Anandpur Sahib. The guru showed up asking the head of a Sikh. Will anyone give his head to someone who’s not going to tell you anything and the reason of your sacrifice and asking you to give up your early life and beliefs? Think about it. My point is the Panj Pyaare were the Sikhs who lived their lives according to Sikhi and gave their heads to the guru because of the love and trust that they had in the guru.
An image on the blog says it wrongly, as many other things, that the woman in the picture is the wife of Guru Nanak Dev ji178.
Marriages of the Sikh Gurus have been in discussion for long. That why the Sikh Gurus married more than once, some denied it to be true; but the history tells otherwise. There’s no question about the different marriages of Guru Gobind Singh ji. Only the guru knows its reasons, we can just look into history and talk about it after analysing the incidents. Anyways, the other marriages of Guru Gobind Singh ji had nothing to do with his mother’s forcefulness179; she didn’t force him. If that’s the case and the reason of children like mentioned on AVB, then why the third marriage happened? Especially when there’s no biological children there; but the Khalsa Panth was given to Mata Sahib Kaur ji as her children.
From the second marriage, the guru had a son named Baba Ajit Singh ji. AV mentioned there’s no child180, but he talked about the adopted son named Ajit Singh. This story comes, I think, after the Joti Jot of Guru Gobind Singh ji. Baba Ajit Singh ji was the biological son of Guru Gobind Singh ji and Mata Sundar Kaur ji. Baba Ajit Singh ji was martyred in the Battle of Chamkaur. This is also the truth that there’s a palak putar of Mata Sundar Kaur ji with the same name Ajit Singh.
The creation of the Khalsa Panth didn’t happen on the day of 14th April 1699181. People who know how calendars work know this very well. To have a universal calendar in the world, so many days were skipped because of which 30th March changed into 14th/13th April. If we talk about BC, the day was same like we have it today – 1 Vaisaakh. Because of the different calendars in usage, you can see some ‘Sikhs’ saying in one year we celebrated the birth of Guru Gobind Singh ji twice but in other year we didn’t do it even once. In actuality, if we talk about BC the gurupurab comes only once in a year. But because of the Gregorian Calendar everything changes because of the mismatch between the days of BC and GC. And those who’re not aware of the different calendars and how they work get confused and start raising the question about it.
AV takes a step further to show his utmost stupidity. Those who’re interested to know how 30th March in 1699 changed into 13th/14th April in the later years should check the different calendars and the days skipped. To give an example, in the month of September 1752, after 2nd September the next day was 14th September. So many days were skipped by different countries over the world from the 16th century to the 20th century. Just go through the whole history of these things if you’re eager to find the truth.
‘Khalistanis’ in 1984 couldn’t have written anything on the Internet about the wives of Guru Gobind Singh ji182. The Internet mainly came in 1990s when the world wide web was introduced.
This dimwit is challenging anybody to show Sikh historical record before 1800 AD where the two wives of the guru were written as one. But, chunnu darling, you said the history was changed by the British. How could you have believed the records before 1800 AD. You said Guru Granth Sahib was also altered which’s written in the 17th century – though the original saroop is still present, idiot – if that couldn’t have been saved from the British, how could you believe something to be intact in the 18th century? Tell me, darling?
He is giving the reference of Mahan Kosh and Twarikh Khalsa to prove his point of the marriages of the tenth guru. These two books have everything against what AV mentioned in his article. Why he is just focusing on the marriages and forgetting everything else? Read two main books and find the truth about all the incidents mentioned on AVB. To those who’re not aware of, let me tell you that the author of Mahan Kosh is Bhai Kahn Singh Nabha, and in the words of AV:
In 1898, Kahan Singh, the Chief Minister of Nabha , a great British stooge wrote a pamplet: Hum Hindu Nahin Hain (We are not Hindus).
So a ‘British stooge’’s work is reliable now? How? Why? Selective stupidity by AV? Why are we using his work to prove something? He doesn’t even know what he’d already written and it should be consistent with his narrative throughout the whole article. But his thoughts go amok when he writes.
The removal of mahants from Nankana Sahib didn’t happen in 1925183. Saka Nankana Sahib happened in the year 1921 when the mahants started ill practices and the peaceful Sikhs were martyred with the help of hooligans. All the efforts of the Sikhs to reclaim their places from the unscrupulous people are getting changed into a totally different history. And it pains me a lot. Sikhs sacrificed their lives to protect the places and the sacrosanct religion of Guru Nanak Dev ji, and in this century the hogs like AV are doing everything they can to change the history of Sikhs. Like the Mughals forgot who gave them the power to rule, in the similar fashion the people like AV forgot who saved them from the hands of the Mughals in the North – the door of all the major invasions in India. You can fool the whole India with your writing and try to brainwash them, but not many in the North. You can’t take away the true history of Sikhs from them. North remembers. 😉
Sir Malcolm Hailey didn’t set up some Sikh Board184. He created another set of group of Sikhs with a new Sikh Sudhar Committee that would be pro-government. It didn’t go well with the general Sikhs as they knew this thing. Like now we know how the translation of Gurbani and history is getting rewritten by the anti-Sikh forces. Like I said; North remembers. We can’t be fooled by likes of you in these matters.
Master Tara Singh can’t be considered as the mentor of the ‘Khalistanis’185. During the partition of India, he didn’t ask to have a new and separate country for the Sikhs especially when the British was ready to give a separate land for the Sikhs. The Congress leadership allured him and the other prominent Akaali leaders with the bogus promises that the Sikhs would be free in India and could practice their religion. In the words of Sirdar Kapoor Singh, it seems like Gulab Singh, Tej Singh and Lal Singh in 1846 are come in 1947 in the form of Maharaja Yadwindra Singh, Master Tara Singh, and Sardar Baldev Singh. The above three names are the ones (AV likes them very much, BTW) who backstabbed the Sikhs.
You will realize, darling, that the British didn’t make an ass out of Sikhs if you read the Singh Sabha Movement and other Sikh movements. After stopping the changes in the Sikh history with your propaganda and stop connecting the unnecessary dots that do not even exist186. I am not declining the evil nature of British. What I am saying is Sikhs know more than the British. More than who was involved with the British. So stop making the claims without reading the history.
Fools like AV can’t stay on one point. While talking about Macauliffe, he said the Sikhs would be ruling Delhi. Later he brought the canals in discussion that the Sikhs would be Brahmins of Punjab187. During 1984, the same thing was repeated by some people that how the foreigner forces are doing everything. And even now, the similar trend is getting spoken by the people.
Let me tell you a story.
The below reference of the Daily Indian Express is made in They Massacre Sikhs – A white paper.
The genesis of the real trouble between the Nirankäris and Akalis goes back to the years when Mrs. Indira Gandhi headed the Union Government. She wanted to weaken the Shiromani Akali Dal but found that Akalis could not be brought to heel. She thought of an elaborate plan to strengthen the Nirankäri sect not only in Punjab but throughout the country and abroad also. Official patronage was extended to the Nirankäris much to the chagrin of Akalis who have always considered the Niraukäris as heretics.
In pursuit of this policy of divide and rule, Mrs. Gandhi personally gave clearance for a diplomatic passport to be issued to the Nirankäri Chief, and the Indian High Commissioners and Ambassadors abroad were instructed to show him respect and regard. This was meant to help the sect to improve its image and increase its following abroad.
I’ve said it in one of the articles that the stories will be same only the characters will be changed. This same story has been retold by the people by bringing the name of Sant Jarnail Singh ji Bhindrawale. In the similar fashion, AV is circulating the stories. His characters are getting changed, the base and agenda is same.
Anyway, coming to the canal propaganda, not only the Sikhs were not told about the fertile lands that they could acquire188. The canal colonies majorly happened in the land which is now in Pakistan. AV himself agreed to that, but he added one baseless point that the eastern Punjabi Sikhs were given those lands189 and forgot the Hindus and Muslims. This canal thing happened because of the less rain in those regions.
King George’s name is also mentioned by AV to do the propaganda. He didn’t mention it’s which one as there’re many George kings in England. According to the timeline given in the article, I will go with George V. Yes, Maharaja Ripudaman Singh attended the coronation of the king at Westminster. What AV didn’t tell was the altercations between the Maharaja and the British. And his efforts in the Gurudwara Reform Movement alienated him further from the British.
Here is another proof of holes in AV’s memory. He said the lands in the west Punjab were bought by the Sikhs in the eastern Punjab. So the Sikhs are the owners of the lands, right? Because, according to AV, Hindus and Muslims were shocked that why the Sikhs were buying the lands190, as if they’re not aware of that. If the lands had been bought by the Sikhs, how ‘the land owning Brahmins now depended on Sikhs who became the new Zamindars’191? The deserted lands were bought by the Sikhs. Had they been with the Brahmins earlier? If they’d them, then how they’re still landowners when the Sikhs bought them? If I’m not wrong then Zamindars had the similar thing like we Punjabis usually say dheke te deni. You will own the land, but you can ask someone to grow anything in there and give you some money every month or year or season.
Going with AV’s theory, the Sikhs were the owners now, why the Brahmins would care much about the lands now? They shouldn’t have sold their lands at the first place? Why they sold? Getting more money? More importantly, I never heard that Brahmins held that much land. The work of the Brahmins had nothing to do with the farming. They rely of the religious rituals for their living.
A saropa is said to be given to a Britisher at Harmandir Sahib by a Sikh after the killing of hundreds of people in Jallianwala Bagh. This incident is also taken by many to prove the Sikhs were on the side of the British. Dude, there’re people who didn’t let the ninth guru come inside Harmandir Sahib at his time. This is what the filth does to someone. The place where the ninth guru sat after that is still there near Akaal Takht Sahib, which not many people know. If someone did honour a killer at Harmandir Sahib, then it’s wrong. It’s as simple as that. Bringing these incidents to prove that the Sikhs sided with the British and they’re honoured by the Sikhs is very wrong.
Not only in those days, even during the Operation Bluestar or killing of innocent Sikhs in Punjab in fake encounters were given an applause by the ‘Sikhs’ and the rewards were given by the government. Wait for some hundred years and you will see some people saying how the Sikhs were happy when the innocent died in the hands of the Indian Forces. This is why history is important. Without knowing the history, everything that AV is doing becomes the history.
There is another story behind it i.e. that the saropa was given after the intimidation. I do not know how reliable that story is. Even by going with the first narration, it might be possible that a saropa was given to him, which, of course, is wrong.
In some vague way, AV wrote some Hindus tried to raise their first born as a Sikh to get the land free as the Britishers were giving the free lands to the Sikhs192. Kuch bhi! 😐 So here isn’t it proved that those people came to Sikhism for financial benefits? This’s seen even during the Sikh Empire also. When the Sikh Empire fell because of the Dogras and the poorbians, many of the ‘Sikhs’ joined their early faiths because now they couldn’t get the benefit from the Sikh Maharaja. So this might be what the first-born conversion was for, to use them as a commodity to gain financial as well as political gain. 😉
Rothschild didn’t favour Sundar Singh Lyallpuri193. In truth, he was sent to jail. AV didn’t write the reason of the incarceration because his Google search wouldn’t have given much information. Let me tell you the reason. After the massacre at the Jallianwala Bagh, the martial law was imposed. On 22nd April, the police caught Lyallpuri as he’s available coincidentally at the railway station where a huge fire started and people were burned alive. He’s charged for murder and sentenced to death. His case was presented in the court by some lawyers and his sentence was changed into imprisonment and fine. That fine was paid by his father after selling his land. Lyallpuri was not given any free lands because of his loyalty towards the British194.
The migration in Bar Chenab colony was in Gujranwala, Lahore, Lyallpur, etc. The people were chosen from the different districts in Punjab where the place of Sundar Singh also came. Hindus and Muslim were each given 31% area of the land. So these Hindus and Muslims were Rothschild’s agents and British loyalist and Bharat-Mata-Hating deshdrohis that’s why they’re given the lands, right? But my chunnu darling said it’s only the Sikhs to whom the lands were given by the British because of their loyalty. Use some brains, man!
Anyways, to understand more on the Canal Colonies I would suggest you to go and check Wikipedia. It will give you the general idea behind this (not saying everything will be correct, but the citations would be helpful), and then read the books on that. The selective mentioning of only Sikhs will only fill you with hatred and make you a boastful person who doesn’t know the history and live believing the non-existing bravery and pride.
The meaning of Singh was always a lion. It’s not during the time of Guru Gobind Singh ji that the meaning changed195. The earlier name was Sikh, and at the time of Guru Gobind Singh ji it was Singh. See the difference, chunnu. Wait, you can’t tell the difference between what started when (Sikhism and Khalsa Panth), how you can tell the difference between Sikh and Singh. I forgot. Sorry.
Let me burst your bubble by saying there’s no mentioning of Vishnu or Ramchandra 8009 and 2531 times respectively in Guru Granth Sahib ji196. These days it’s become very easy for me to know from which part of the dark pit of the world a person is coming and talking about the Sikh history if he can’t give the correct translations. If you’ve changed Ram into Ramchandra and Har into Vishnu (a deity), then I am happy to tell you that you need to learn the basics of Sikhi first. Later with proper understanding, you can move on to the next classes and then start talking about history. In the last post also, we’ve seen how much AV knows about Gurbani.
Again, the inner peace has nothing to do with the land you live in197. Sikhism is not bound to a particular country. The Sikhs live in so many countries. They practice their faith wherever they live, so do not try to bind them to either Punjab or India.
The main post of AV is completed now, but I’m sure I will find the lies in the comment section also where there’re more than one thousand comments. I’m sure I have missed some of the points in the main article, and I will try to write them in the next posts as we move on with this crappy shit of AV.
Negligence of AV is extraordinary. On our YouTube channel, somebody called AV a Brahmin-ass licker. Sorry for that, but, yeah, it’s written. It seems true to me because AV mentioned the dasas (Bhagats) never existed198. The truth is the verses of Bhagats in Guru Granth Sahib ji, especially the verses of Bhagat Kabir ji, broke the very bone of the caste/varna system and priesthood. He didn’t believe that Brahmins were better in any way just because they’re Brahmins.
I doubt there’re Brahmins who fully respect the Bhagat. There might be, I mean, who understand the message and are not living in their delusional superiority-complex. The verses of Bhagats even said the Vedas are of no use without Naam. Which Brahmin would agree to that? Vedas are the primarily sources of the truth for a Brahmin or in general a Hindu. If you’re going to disregard that, you have nothing. Do everything which’s written in the Vedas but Naam, that is of no use. That’s why in Sikhism the Naam has the utmost importance. Singhs often say after reading Gurbani, after understanding Gurbani, and after doing everything that Gurbani says, you will realize how important Naam Simran is. You will forever be in bliss.
Read the below comment of a reader on AV’s blog to know why the Bhagats had to not exist to keep the supremacy of others.
Sirji I'm giving my ma (english) and guess what the Indian literature syllabus is full of???
BHAKTI MOVEMENT and KABIR THE GRRAT SOCIAL REFORMER..
It's painful but degree Lee hai toh karna toh padega... however one thing stands out on one of the dohas where he talks about 'Shabd' sound as the primary creator ... How cleverly they have injected vedic knowledge into poison injected verses to make a cobbler or Darji (not sure!) into an intellectual behemoth!!
For us Sikhs, it doesn’t matter if you’re a cobbler or yeoman or barber, you can have the Brahmgyaan if you do Naam Simran. It’s not true for the likes of the one who wrote the above comment.
Bhagat Namdev ji even said the Hindus are blind and Muslims are one-eye. How many Hindus will cheer to that?
So cracking of the backbone of the Brahmanical religion makes AV say the Bhagats never existed.
AV tried to prove the names Hari, Prabhu, Jagdish, Ram, Karta, Govind, etc., are the names of the Hindu gods199. In reality, they’re the names of the One based on His actions and attributes. One thing that has confused the BHs and they failed to give any response is that the word Allah is also mentioned in Guru Granth Sahib ji. They call the names of Waheguru as deities … so Allah also an incarnation of Vishnu? When he came? In which book is it written? Let’s say Ram is Ramchandra as the Hindus believe, so Allah is also someone who sits in the Heavens and is not omnipresent? Should we take it that the Sikhs don’t believe in the Omnipresent One? I won’t go in detail about this because this’s very cliché for me. Just read the different names of Waheguru.
Mind you, the Sikhs were not created to spill the blood of Muslims200. Don’t bring the Sikhs into your hate-filled minds to talk crap about others. You don’t like Muslims, your choice. The Sikhs don’t have any issues with the Hindus or Muslims or Christians, or anyone who just is of another religion and doesn’t try to change the Sikh history and meaning of Gurbani. But, of course, the Sikhs have the issue with those, regardless of their religion or country, who’re changing the history of Sikhs and meaning of Gurbani.
The hatred for the Muslims is so much in the head of some Indians that they cannot even imagine that the Sikh religious scripture has the verses of a Muslim201. (So we’ve crossed 200 lies of AV? I was right.) 😊
Sikhi is so great. If you believe in Naam Simran, then we’re on the same path and we don’t care about your religion or caste.
There’re couple of things that I would like to discuss here related to hatred. Followers of AV say, and if I’m not wrong, I’ve seen it written also by him, that he doesn’t hate the Jews. They’re not bad. He hates elite billionaire who run the world and crash the economies and are responsible for all the evil in the world. This is a libellous statement because if it’s really true that he doesn’t hate someone because of his creed, then he would never have written something about Baba Farid ji. You hate Muslims because of the invasions in the past century. But your hatred has consumed you so much that you hate a Sufi saint also just because he’s a Muslim.
Not only Muslims but Sikhs also. His followers also say he doesn’t hate Sikhs; he hates ‘Khalistanis’. Even that is a mask to hide the hatred that he has for the Sikhs. It’s not just merely an imagination but his words prove it. Read the below lines in the comment section of the article. (Excuse the caps-lock as it’s written as-is on AVB.)
SIKHS WERE CREATED TO FIGHT MUSLIMS-- BUT SEE THEIR HOLY BOOK IS PACKED WITH A MUSLIM FELOWs VERSES
I USED TO ADMIRE SIKHS WHEN I WAS IN SCHOOL
NOT ANY MORE !
Evidence enough that his hatred is not limited to a particular person but the whole religion.
In the first part, we discussed about the Sikhs participating in the world wars before the partition. Talking about the world wars is also a win-win situation for AV. If in the memory of Sikhs, the sculptures were to be installed by some countries, then AV would write that the Sikhs were controlled by Jews that’s why they’re only getting the memorial. If nothing of that sort is done by anyone, then AV will cry why the Sikhs sided with the British in the world wars if there’d to be no sculpture in the memory. Actually, his whole article points to this. So a statement can be moulded into any direction. No clear stand is taken by him on almost everything; and if by chance he did, there’re so many contradictions and non-existed stories.
You can check some statues of Sikhs around the world which highlight the bravery of the Sikhs and the beliefs of the people there.
Whatever the hallucinations AV has, one thing that is clear from his article is that he has admitted consciously or unconsciously that the Sikhs are brave. Can be during the 1857 or in Dunkirk. He said the Sikhs held the fort there. So just praise it, chunnu darling, because this’s who the Sikhs are. Not the ones who sell their daughters to save themselves.
Hari Singh Nalwa is one of the great warriors of the Sikh religion. He’s called one of the greatest conquers of the world. As he’s a Sikh and people praise him, so that naturally makes AV mad. Because the Sikhs shouldn’t be praised, only the mumbo-jumbo that he writes is the truth and the whole history of the world should be ignored by the people.
Just think of it, man. A man is called the greatest conquers, and it triggered AV and showed his insecurity. Rothschild’s historian didn’t create any stories related to Gurudwara Panja Sahib202. The lack of basic education is showing its true colours. That’s why in the western countries people strive to give a basic education to everyone, so that they do not end up like AV, whose brain is in his knees.
The Sikh Empire and its traitors have a long history, which will consume so much time. But just to give you an idea, Hari Singh Nalwa didn’t infiltrate the court of Maharaja Ranjit Singh203. It’s the Dogra men who sided with the British for their own powers. I know it’s shameful, so the burden of shame is pushed on the shoulders of the Sikhs, but it should be on those who’re ignoring this historical fact that the Dogra betrayed the Sikhs in the war with the British.
Like some true incidents AV wrote in his article but manipulated its true reasoning, in the same way he writes about the Kamagata Maru incident where the Sikhs were denied the entry in Canada because of racism and they had to return back to India where they’re killed. The entry was rejected not because of some disease that the Sikhs had204.
The Canadian Prime Minister has apologised for that.
The true lives of the great people in Sikhism should be read by all the people, otherwise the likes of AV will change the whole history like he’s doing with his own religion. So Kamagata Maru ship was led by Baba Gurdit Singh ji. Gurdit Singh didn’t supply milk to some Rothschild’s regiment205. His father was not a Rothschild agent206. He was in the Khalsa Army who fought against the British in the Anglo-Sikh wars, and the guru of AV, Gulab Singh Traitor, was in parallel discussion with the British for the downfall of the Sikh Empire.
AV said the passengers of Kamagata Maru were declined entering Canada because of some disease. So all the Sikhs had the disease? Only those who had the disease were picked? Or they got it on the voyage? And as AV said Baba Gurdit Singh was Rothschild’s man, then how hard was it for Rothschild to allow his own men to enter a country? Couldn’t he just change this rule? Were all the Sikhs debauched that they’re suffering from trachoma?
Where are we going with all these illicit stories?
It’s not possible if the anti-Sikh posts are written and the name of Sant Jarnail Singh ji Bhindrawale doesn’t come up. His name will come automatically. Just to give you an example, on Quora someone commented about Sant Bhindrawale on our answer when the topic of discussion had nothing to do with either Sant Bhindrawale or 1984. How AV can lag behind in this case. He has to show his paramount stupidity. So while discussing the massacre of Sikhs in 1984 after the assassination of Indra Gandhi, he wrote these (excuse the caps-lock):
WE KNOW HOW MANY SIKHS WERE KILLED -- ALL INNOCENT PEOPLE.. BUT ONLY GROWN UP SIKH MEN WERE TARGETED ..
MOST OF THE SIKHS KILLED IN THE 1984 RIOTS ( AFTER INDIRA GANDHI WAS MURDERED )WERE KILLED BY DISPLACED HINDUS FROM PUNJAB --DRIVEN AWAY BY THE SIKHS207 ..
IN THE CASE OF 1984 SIKH MASSACRE THE FORE WAS DOUBLE REACTION208--
1) FOR INDIRA GANDHIs MURDER
2) REVENGE FOR SIKHS PRO-ACTIVELY KILLING PEACEFUL PUNJABI HINDU BEFORE INDIRA GANDHI WAS MURDERED.
Read the last line of first paragraph, and the justification in the later paragraphs. Please. So killing the grownup is fine then? Killing innocents in revenge is fine then? Wasn’t aware of that. I thought all the innocent lives are precious, and a sane man should try to protect them at all the costs. But it’s AV, man, who doesn’t have a brain, so he can write anything.
Sant Bhindrawale didn’t kill any innocent200. By all the members of the Litter Committee of BHs and SSs or trolls it’s been mentioned multiple times that Bhindrawale killed so many people. Due to the votes of the Hindus, Captain Amrinder Singh claimed more than 35k Hindus were killed. So AV’s claim of 24,100 is nothing210. AV writes that there’re no Hindu widow colonies in Punjab but the Sikh widow colonies are out there outside of Punjab. Isn’t it proof enough that the exaggerated number of Hindus who’re killed during the 1980s or 1990s is not true? Because thousands are really a big number and we should be able to see the colonies where the Hindus were settled or something, no? See, you just need to read these bogus articles carefully and the answers will already be in there.
Bhindrawale’s clarion call was recorded by AV (sarcasm), where he claims Bhindrawale asked that each Sikh is equal to 35 Hindus, and the Sikhs shouldn’t take more than that211. In which sense AV wrote this down, I do not need to tell you that. Bhindrawale in his own speeches (in the language that AV can’t even spell) said not to kill any innocent. And if you really want to talk about the numbers then he reminded the Sikhs if the government is planning to attack Darbar Sahib then remember the Sikhs in the Battle of Chamkaur where they fought with lakhs of enemies. So at least hear what he actually said rather than writing crap. Wait, you do not know Punjabi.
Rothschild didn’t build Damdama Sahib212. I mean, seriously. Are you that dumb?
A food for thought. Like I said earlier, the stories will be same only the characters will be changed. AV talked about the British or Jews that the Sikhs were used by them and everywhere the Sikhs were filled in. In the similar way, he says during those days back in 1980s and 1990s the Sikhs were put in the top posts213. Think of this: the Indian Forces were killing the Sikh rebels wherever they’re seen, including the fake encounters that Jaswant Singh Khalra exposed, they were getting the medals and higher positions in the forces, why would they try to keep the Sikhs everywhere especially when they’re killing everywhere? Assassinations of Indra Gandhi, Beant Singh, General Vaidya, etc., why they happened? Is there any reason? Were these people involved in something? Choose your answer.
Now, think of the ‘killing’ of the Hindus in Punjab, Air India bombing, etc., why that happened? Were those people involved in something? Suppose the Sikh rebels killed them in cold blood, what they achieved by that? So the Sikh rebels were angry with the Indian Government and the Indian Forces’ atrocities in Punjab after the Operation Bluestar, so they bombed the Air India plane? What was achieved by that? Now think of all these incidents, and link them to the police and the agencies. What they achieved? Choose your answer.
Anyway, I didn’t get the time to write the post ‘Defender of Faith’ where many of the misconceptions will be cleared.
Damn, I have to write it again. The Sikh Gurus were not Hindus and their cremation didn’t happen according to the Hindu rituals214.
Amrinder Singh, a user, commented on AV’s article and mentioned some sane points, to that AV replied:
i am NOT interested in a debate -- i am happy to lose this debate , if it will make indian sikhs become desh bhakts.
If you can’t back your points with reasoning and proof, and are not ready to talk when questioned, then you’re doing the propaganda, not telling the truth. In most of the answers to the comments, he is mentioning the same things that the Sikh Gurus were Hindus and they lived their lives according to Hinduism215. That is not the evidence or reasoning, it’s a statement. Why they were Hindus and how they lived their lives as Hindus is not talked about with irrefutable proof. Although AV brought the lame reasoning of a boxer and his religion and failed to tell the similarity between the two. It’s like assuming something and then making it as a fact.
Bhindrawale was not sponsored by someone216. On the Internet, people have been writing that if a person is going up exponentially, it’s because of Illuminati or other forces. Similar comment has been made by AV. By going in the same way, it will be easy to say that AV is also sponsored by someone, no? To give you a general idea, on Feb 2012 the total count of profile visit of his blog was 6800, March 2013 had around 23k, March 2014 had 50k, March 2015 75k, April 2016 4mn, July 2017 5mn, Dec 2018 935mn, and now 1bn. So what happened between July 2017 and Dec 2018. How was there a sudden increase in the total visits? Is he sponsored by Illuminati? 😉
Secondly, these counts are not the unique number of visitors that he got. With each click the number is added to the profile visit. You can check any blogger who’s showing his/her profile. Your click/refresh of the page will add another number to that. This is what his halfwit readers do not know about. And it is very much possible that if he highlights the count on his post, a reader will definitely go and check it out and add his count there.
Thirdly, a refresh script can be added in the browser that helps you to refresh a particular page in the seconds you want to refresh in. If we count 5-second-refresh rate then in one year you can have 6.3mn (12*60*24*365) views using only one tab in one browser. You can change the refresh rate, of course, and you might have to have some different routers while hitting the site of Google, otherwise it will know the enormous traffic that the server is getting from your browser.
Fourthly, the traffic on his site and the count on his blog do not match. So it is definitely not genuine, nor he is the number one blogger in the world. From April to Sept 2019, the total number of visitors/clicks on the blog was 620k. We can take it as 1mn for calculations. But if we check the number of profile visits between May (935,444,704) to Sep (1,012,094,256), we have more than 76mn. Think about it. Just think about it.
Fifthly, just check the comparison between AVB and AltHouse blogs, you will know why I call AV a wasted sperm.
Gurdeep Singh commented on AVB:
History raped.
Another example of Hindu paranoia.
To that AV said, are you a Khalistani?
This is the level of knowledge and the debate skills that AV has. If you call the BHs wrong, then you’ll always be a Khalistani because they do not have valid arguments and knowledge to participate in the debate to put their remarks on the table. What they are capable of doing is propaganda, without backing up their claims.
I will end this post by showing the comment of Kiran on his blog, who’s as paranoid as AV, but he took few steps ahead of AV.
Besides they are trying to whitewash history by wiping out hindu faith of Guru's, making false claims of Amrit chhakna, it was ten Brahmins who were first initiated into the Akali Nihand (martial wing) partook of this along with others total 25. Zionists hijacked and robbed of the history and created Panj Piara's and 5K's to faction hindustan and realize their conspiracy to colonise hindustan.
See? This is what makes the Sikh blood boil when these people try to change the history of Sikhs. Have you seen the Sikhs trying to do the same with other religions like these people do?
Peace.
