Concept of Akaal Shakti in Sikhism
and the wrong conclusions by non-Sikhs – part III
We have
covered the yajna in the second part. The famous and misleading part was that,
telling you the truth. The meaning of that was totally forgotten by the people
while writing the article. They must be ashamed of themselves if they somehow
get to this article and read it from the beginning.
 |
| The woman in the picture is no Akaal Shakti |
Jagbir, the author with little brain, says further that the Sikhs can’t
get rid of Divine Mother from their Ardaas and Jap Ji Sahib. Actually, we don’t
want to get rid of Akaal Shakti. We believe in Akaal Shakti, the problem is
with the definition that you chose to represent it, by having a picture of a
woman with the three deities below her. Doing that so makes you the dumbest
person on the planet. I am preparing a list of dumb people who know nothing of
Sikhi but write articles/books about it. I will make sure your name is also
included on that.
It’s very puzzling to see these fanatics claim
something and then totally say the opposite thing later. He says, ‘The
1430-page Guru Granth Sahib refers to God Almighty (Waheguru) as both Father
and Mother i.e., God.’ My question is if Waheguru is both Father and Mother,
and Waheguru doesn’t have any form, then why you want to have a form of His
Shakti? Just because you are a male and you need a female to complete yourself,
so even He needs that? What kind of message does it give to the followers of a
religion! Stupid people never amaze be with their writings.
We have already discussed the stupid logic of
Nirmala Devi who said why Sikhs have ‘Chandi’garh if they do not believe in the
Devi. (How people can be so dumb!)
Next something like a spiritual experience of a
person named Kash is mentioned that how he saw everyone from the Hindu gods to
Abrahamic prophets to Sikh Gurus. The woman in the talk, Nirmala Devi, said
that she was with Guru Nanak Dev ji and all the other Sikh Gurus, trying to be Akaal
Shakti. And there are actual people who believe in this! Pathetic! The next
mistake which was made was to describe the incidents of meeting these godly
people one by one by Kash. He was not able to recognize some of them as meeting
them the first time. But some Spirit of God told him who was who and where they
were because they were invisible for him.
She compared Guru Nanak Dev ji with the prophets and
Hindu gods as if he’s just a normal person who came on this earth with a knowledgeable
book. Guru Nanak Dev ji was but Waheguru.
joiq rUip hir Awip gurU nwnku khwXau ]
qw qy AMgdu BXau qq isau qqu imlwXau ]
AMgid ikrpw Dwir Amru siqguru iQru kIAau ]
Amrdwis Amrqu CqRü gur rwmih dIAau ]
gur rwmdws drsnu pris kih mQurw AMimRq bXx ]
mUriq pMc pRmwx purKu guru Arjunu ipKhu nXx
]1] – AMg 1408
Awip nrwiexu klw Dwir jg mih prvirXau ]
inrMkwir Awkwru joiq jg mMfil kirXau ] – AMg
1395
The article goes
on saying a Sikh by the name of Baldave Singh came to the group and a nitname
pothi was given to him. It’s translated into English, I guess, this’s what
I understood from the writing. He was reading the 30th pauri of
Jap Ji Sahib and stopped when he read Eka maayi. He was confused why the
feminine form was mentioned in gurbani. He even thought that it’s
changed over the period of time.
To convince the
readers of the cult of Nirmala Devi, the author states, ‘But how was this
possible if countless others had also seen the same pearls hundreds of millions
of times before him, but yet failed to detect their feminine nature? Was he the
only Sikh ever to do so? Was he implying that all other Sikhs were blind, including
their priests, ragis, theologians, translators and proof-readers? That would be
preposterous.’ Whenever you need to convince someone, bring a wrong story
with your own conclusions and characters, and boom! You have the person on your
side.
OMG! I usually don’t
read the whole article first while debunking the claims of someone. I read and
write simultaneously. I’ve come to that paragraph which says that Baldeve asked
what is the meaning of Eka maayi in Jap Ji Sahib. Kash, whose name I got
to know is Kashwinder Singh, a Sikh, said he would go to Guru Nanak Dev ji and
ask him about it. He did his meditation, and through Dasam Dwaar he went
to the heavens and there a woman was sitting, Nirmala Devi. Damn! They went to
meet Guru Nanak Dev ji and asked him. Guru Nanak Dev ji said Eka maayi is
Nirmala Devi.
I am laughing now.
I can’t just put it into words, I don’t know the exact word that can describe
the stupidity of people. Bloody lummox! People are abjuring for these fanatics!
Seriously? These goat-headed people will always claim to be the Power or God
Himself. You know the best thing that I like in Sikhism is that no Sikh Guru
ever said that he was Waheguru, even though They were.
Let me describe
two stories of these fake cults who mostly are in the western countries because
there the people are usually seeking a refuge in the spiritual realm. So it’s
easy to fool them. We have the example of this Nirmala Devi and Osho.
There’s a man who
said that he’s Guru Arjan Dev ji. Sikhs knew the trick very well. They didn’t
say anything, welcomed him in the place, fed him. Next day they said if you
are Guru Arjan Dev ji, then you can sit on the searing tva. That was the
day when he’s last seen. And this Baldave who’s talked about, he was born on a
foreign land, no Punjabi, only English and French. So easy to fool those
people. If these portentous people really have the knowledge of Sikhi, or gurbani
in general, then come to the puratan sampardaas and talk to the Singhs
there; you can’t do that, even if you have the audacity to talk to them, you
will wet your pants then and there.
Second story is
related to Sant Jarnail Singh ji Bhindrawale. Once doing the katha, he
said that these naamdharis are saying that they are the gurus now. Guru
Gobind Singh ji fired an arrow which passed through ten thousand people, can
these naamdhari gurus do that? There was silence then.
Don’t be a fool,
Sikhs! These blizzards come in the Sikh religion, but nothing has changed us so
far. Listen to the katha, history, and give no mind to these fools.
Here is the joke
on their website.
Shri Mataji
Nirmala Devi is the Aykaa Mayee of the Jap Jee Sahib — This Revealed Truth is
Absolute. (With this Revelation all Sikhs reciting the Jap Jee Sahib and
uttering the word Aykaa Mayee will be always reminded who this One Mother is,
and where She resides within them.)
This simpleton
mentioned that the Sikhs are so ignorant that they will agree that
Govind/Gobind mentioned in gurbani is Guru Gobind Singh ji, not Krishna.
Stupidity is reaching to new heights here. No Sikh ever says that Gobind/Govind
word is for Guru Gobind Singh ji, or for Krishna. The problem with these
lunatics is that they don’t know the meaning. If a name is given to a deity,
they will consider him a god but will never examine the meaning of the word. In
Sikhism, every word has a meaning, especially if given to Waheguru.
We have an article
already written on the blog.
You can check the
names there, we are regularly updating that article. But for now, the word into
consideration is Gobind. Gobind is made of two words: Go + Bind. Go means
earth, and bind means nurturer/protector. Waheguru protects the earth, so he’s
called Gobind, not Vishnu/Krishna. If more reason is needed, then read gurbani.
bRhmw ibsnu mhwdyau qRY gux
rogI ivic haumY kwr kmweI – 735
ds Aauqwr rwjy hoie vrqy mhwdyv AauDUqw ]
iqn@ BI AMqu n pwieE qyrw lwie Qky ibBUqw –
747
bRhmw ibsnu mhwdyau qRY gux Buly haumY mohu
vDwieAw ] –
852
mihmw n jwnih byd
] bRhmy nhI jwnih Byd ]
Avqwr n jwnih AMqu
] prmysru pwrbRhm byAMqu ]1]
ApnI giq Awip jwnY
] suix suix Avr vKwnY ]1]
rhwau ] sMkrw nhI
jwnih Byv ] Kojq hwry dyv ]
dyvIAw nhI jwnY
mrm ] sB aUpir AlK pwrbRhm ]2] – 894
bRhmw ibsnu irKI
munI sMkru ieMdu qpY ByKwrI ]
mwnY hukmu sohY
dir swcY AwkI mrih APwrI ] – 992
mY n gnysih ipRQm
mnwaˆU ] iksn ibsn kbhUM nh iDAwaUˆ ]
I
don’t worship Ganesha first. I don’t meditate on the name of Krishna or Vishnu.
kwn sunY pihcwn n iqn
so ] ilv lwgI morI pg ien so ]434]
I
have heard about him but don’t recognize him. I am always meditating on the
name of Waheguru.
pWie ghy jb qy qumry qb qy koaU AWK qry nhI
AwnÎo ]
rwm rhIm purwn kurwn Anyk khYˆ mq eyk n mwnÎo
]
isMimRiq swsqR byd sBY bhu Byd khYˆ hm eyk n
jwnÎo ]
sRI Aispwn ikRpw qumrI kir mY n khÎo sB qoih
bKwnÎo ]1]
You can take your shop somewhere else because the Sikhs
are not fools. If you come with nonsensical questions, you will be humiliated
to such an extent that you will think twice before asking questions to the
Sikhs. Above verses from gurbani are enough to tell why we don’t worship
any deities. Although, we don’t even abuse them; no hatred, no fear. Simple.
I
like these lines when the lady says, ‘But human beings have a great sense of
how to twist and turn everything into something that's just the opposite.’
She just exposed herself.
Another
stupid story is here:
"One
day I was travelling from London and there was one Indian lady who came to see
Me and she said," I was surprised to see your disciples. Their faces were
shining with such light. I've never seen any disciples like that.”
I
asked her, "Who are you?"
She
said, "I'm married in Guru Nanak's family and all the people in his family
are just the opposite to what Shri Guru Nanak was.”
So
I said, "Because they worship Shri Ganesha.”
So
she said that, "In our family nobody worships Shri Ganesh.”
I
said, "It cannot be possible? How is it?" They believe in the
Nirakar, the formless God of Chaitanya. I said, "But who is the Source of
that Chaitanya? Why don't they find out who is the Source?"
So
they said that Nanaka has only talked up to this point.
He's not talked about the source.
I
said, "Better find out. Because in this book maybe some things
have been taken away.”
Read the highlighted lines again. When they
can’t find it what they are talking about, it means the texts were altered.
Like the story of Ajit Vadakayil. This is the stupidest way to convince
someone. You can say anything and everything and then claim it to be removed
from the sources. What the hell, man! Use some brains.
Pritam Singh Gill, whose name I never heard,
but he wrote a book called ‘The Trinity of Sikhism’ (this is from their site,
don’t know the truth though) says, ‘Brahma, Vishnu, and Siva were worshipped
as gods; they were known as Trinity.’ No Mr. Pritam, you are not educated
enough to write books. First, you should go to a good school where they teach
basics of Sikhi, and then you should read history and gurbani, later
when you know a thing or two, then write about Sikhs.
As we are talking about Eka maayi,
even I want to tell you my experience about it. I was in college those days. I,
with my friends, went to explore the beliefs of others in an exhibition. There
a young lady took us to a room where the pictures were representing the cycles
of life. My friends and I were amazed by looking at them. Then came a picture
where the verses from Guru Granth Sahib ji were taken.
eykw mweI jugiq ivAweI iqin cyly prvwxu ]
Of course, I was the only Sikh
among my friends, so she looked at me and said, ‘It’s also mentioned in Jap
Ji Sahib that “Eka Maayi jagat mein aayi.”’ I was suppressing my laugh. She
didn’t even have the understanding of the words, and she was translating to me.
I wish I could have told her that she were wrong, but I didn’t.
The same is true with this Nirmala
Devi’s cult. She doesn’t know the meaning of jugat (jugiq) and viyaayi (ivAweI).
She just saw maayi written there, so jumped to the conclusion, the
Divine Mother, and completely forgot the other words written there. From the
article, it’s clear that Nirmala Devi and her followers are completely
illiterate when it comes to the Punjabi language. The author mentioned that
Kash was not aware of Punjabi. But this Nirmala Devi was said to talk with Guru
Nanak Dev ji in a language that Kash was not aware of, thinking it’s Punjabi.
But if it were true, she wouldn’t have blatantly ignored the words to convince
the fools that she’s right. I will definitely write the translation of the pauri
in English in the article.
One incident that puzzles me a lot is that
this woman, who was already present in heaven somehow (as she was the Akaal
Shakti 😐),
and Kash went ‘somewhere’ to meet Guru Nanak Dev ji. If you have read the lives
of gursikhs and listened to the katha, you must know that there
comes a stage when Guru Sahib gives darshan to the gursikhs. If
this Kash was supposed to be awakened his ‘kundli’ and used Dasam Dwaar,
then he was in such a stage that he could have seen Guru Nanak Dev ji then and
there, there wouldn’t have been any need to travel though clouds and all. Well,
IT’S JUST FAKE!
The biggest mistake that this Nirmala Devi
and her followers made is that they separated Waheguru from His Power (Akaal
Shakti.) YOU CAN’T SEPARATE WAHEGURU FROM HIS POWER. It’s already been discussed
in the second part of this series: think of a man, can you separate him from
his power? Can you separate sunlight from the sun? You can’t! You can’t say you
have two entities now. No. Waheguru is Akaal Shakti. Akaal Shakti is Waheguru.
Waheguru doesn’t have any form, nor does Akaal Shakti.
There should be no room of doubt that one
word can have multiple meanings and according to the context the meaning is
taken. The very example that I want to discuss before moving on to arrogance of
this cult is of Ram.
slok mÚ 3 ] rwmu rwmu krqw sBu jgu iPrY rwmu n pwieAw jwie ]
– AMg 555
sloku mÚ 1 ] shMsr dwn dy ieMdRü roAwieAw ]
prs rwmu rovY Gir AwieAw ]
AjY su rovY BIiKAw Kwie ] AYsI drgh imlY
sjwie ]
rovY rwmu inkwlw
BieAw ] sIqw lKmxu ivCuiV gieAw ] – AMg 953
The above highlighted word is Ram.
One Ram is for Waheguru, one for Ram Chandar ji, and one for Pars Ram ji. If
you will replace the meaning with the other Ram in any of the verses above, the
meaning will be completely wrong. So the context is very much important while
trying to understand the meaning. We can have another word – Har.
sÍYXw ] hir so muK hY
hirqI duK hY AilkY hir hwr pRBw hrnI hY ]
Real
meaning: Sumbh
tells his brother, Nisumbh, about her that her face glows like Moon, by seeing
it laziness goes away, and her hair is more beautiful than the snake around the
neck of Shiv ji.
Wrong
meaning: Sumbh
tells his brother, Nisumbh, about her that her face glows like Vishnu, Vishnu
takes away laziness, and Vishnu’s hair is more beautiful than Vishnu around the
neck of Vishnu.
locn hY hir sy srsy
hir sy Bruty hir sI brunI hY ]
Real
meaning: Her eyes
are like flowers, and eyebrows are curly like a bow, and sight is like an
arrow.
Wrong
meaning: Her eyes
are like Vishnu, eyebrows are curly like Vishnu, and sight is like Vishnu.
kyhir so krhw clbo
hir pY hir kI hirnI qrnI hY ]
Real
meaning: Her waist
is like a lion, her gait like an elephant’s.
Wrong
meaning: Her waist
is like Vishnu, her gait like an elephant’s.
hY kr mY hir pY hir
soˆ hir rUp kIey hir kI DrnI hY ]
Real
meaning: She has a
sword in her hand, has a lion to ride, she is glowing like the sun, she is wife
of Shiv ji.
Wrong
meaning: She has
Vishnu in her hand, has Vishnu to ride, she is glowing like Vishnu, she is wife
of Vishnu.
This
is the perfect example to show the people that if a non-Sikh will do the
translation, it will be far from the reality if he knows only one meaning of
the word. Many of the illiterates will say ‘Har’ means Vishnu. Read the ‘wrong
meaning’ above if Har should be translated into Vishnu. Bhai Kahn Singh ji
Nabha wrote more than 40 meanings of Har which came in gurbani.
The reason behind mentioning this
is the next part that we are going to discuss. It’s related to the translation
of Santokh Singh. And the author says he assumed many things and didn’t give a
correct translation. Most of the times when an academic scholar gives a
translation it’s only of the words, not the deep meanings that helps you
connect to Waheguru. That’s where the puratan sampardaas come into
picture to fill those spaces left by the scholars. Like Damdami Taksaal,
started by Guru Gobind Singh ji, and it’s still working and will always work. Its
main responsibilities are to spread the message of Guru Sahibaans, to give the
correct translation of gurbani, educate the Sikhs to do katha,
and talk about history, etc.
Although those scholars are also
welcome if the translation is not against gurmat. But if we are going
through the writings of this cult, they are just a sacrilege of gurbani
and distorting the meaning for their own benefits to spread the words to
attract fools that their ‘leader’ was right.
The writer says, ‘But Maa-ee
and mayaa are two distinct words with different meanings. There is no room for
error as the Sikh Holy Scripture clearly says Aykaa Maa-ee (One Mother) and
leaves no room for any ambiguity.’ Let’s first see if the meaning of maayee
(Maa-ee) can only be Mother or Akaal Shakti, or not.
Pauri which is in the talk is 30th, just thought of
telling those who are not much aware of Jap Ji Sahib but reading this article.
guru
eIsru guru gorKu brmw guru pwrbqI mweI ] – AMg 2
hau
rih n skw ibnu dyKy myrI mweI
] – AMg 94
aun
qy rwKY bwpu n mweI ]
aun qy rwKY mIqu n BweI ] – AMg 182
jo jo icqvY dwsu hir mweI ] – AMg 202
Above are the verses from Guru Granth Sahib
ji where the word ‘maayi’ is used in different meanings. According to
the writer, the meaning of maayi can be only Akaal Shakti – the whole
article is to prove that in the Sikh scripts goddesses are worshipped. The
writer completely ignored the 5th pauri of Jap Ji Sahib,
where the word maayi is used to represent Lakshmi and Saraswati.
Following are the meanings of maayi
from Mahan Kosh.
After showing the vague knowledge
of gurbani, the writer asked some ‘tough’ questions that he would have
got answered if he’s read gurbani or listened to the katha, or
even asked a Singh from Damdami Taksaal. Anyways, let’s answer the questions.
Question: Where between the 29th and 31st stanzas is it ever
mentioned that"Guru Saaheeb tells us that God creates Maayaa"?
Answer: Mr. writer, it’s written in the line where your beloved
Mata Ji forgot to mention because she was on cloud nine to tell you a fake
story. I already mentioned that she completely ignored the words ‘jugat’
and ‘veaayi.’ Had she not forgotten those words, she would have
understood how it’s. So now listen up, fools. Maaya is jarh(jVH) (means maaya can’t do
anything if there’s no chetna, or Waheguru’s role in it.) When Waheguru
(Eka) meets (jugat) with maaya (maayi) and His chetna
reflected on maaya, then maaya veaayi (conceived), means
gave birth to the deities. If we read Dasam Guru Granth Sahib ji, Guru Gobind
Singh ji mentioned the same.
cOpeI
] pRQm kwl sB jg ko qwqw ] qw qy BXo qyj ibKXwqw ]
soeI
BvwnI nwmu khweI ] ijn isgrI Xh isRsit aupweI ]29]
cOpeI
] pRQmY EAMkwr iqn khw ] so Dun pUr jgq mo rhw ]
qw qy
jgq BXo ibsQwrw ] purK pRikRiq jb duhU` ibcwrw ]30]
pauVI ]
KMfw ipRQmY swj kY ijn sB sYswru aupwieAw ]
bRhmw
ibsn mhys swij kudrqI dw Kylu rcwie bxwieAw ]
Question: Where is it ever written that Rajas-Sattva-Tamas mean
Activity-Rhythm-Passivity?
Answer: I heard from many Sikhs that Guru Granth Sahib ji is the translation
of Jap Ji Sahib in a broader way. And it’s so true if you do Sehaj Path every
day. Highlighted is the answer to your question. 😊
bRhmw ibsnu mhysu qRYgux isir DMDY lwieAw ]
mwieAw
kw mUlu rcwieEnu qurIAw suKu pwieAw ]2] – AMg 509
Question: Where does it state, and who told him, that"These
three qualities symbolize Barmaa-Vishnoo-Shiva"?
Answer: Read the verses mentioned above.
When everything else is failed,
then comes their feminine card, seems like the writer is a woman, not sure
though. Bhai Santokh Singh was called a patriarchal person who happened to
refer to Waheguru as a He, but not a She as maaya is talked about here.
If you know why Jap Ji Sahib was written and where, it’s very easy to
understand gurbani, then there will be no questions circling around like
this. We are translating the tika, not gurbani, in English. The
first part is available to read.
Let’s translate the 30th
pauri without any further delay because this article is getting very
long.
While talking with the Siddhs,
they asked Guru Nanak Dev ji, ‘According to our beliefs, there’s one Parbhati,
who is a mother; and one Shivji, who’s a father. When Shivji told the tale of
Amar Katha to Parbati, she slept but a fish heard it; Shivji had said a Siddh
will be born. From that fish, a Siddh was born whose name was Mashandar. We
believe that the world is because of them. Tell us your opinion.
eykw mweI jugiq ivAweI;
iqin cyly prvwxu ]
When Waheguru connected with maaya
and His chetna reflected on maaya, then the maaya was
conceived (a term to tell how the world was born), and from that three deities/gunns
were born.
Ehu vyKY Enw ndir n AwvY; bhuqw eyhu ivfwxu ]
Waheguru is seeing those deities,
but they can’t see Waheguru. How wonderful is this!
Maaya is seeing the three gunns,
but they can’t see maaya. How wonderful is this!
Awdysu; iqsY Awdysu ]
I bowed to Him, I bowed to Him.
Awid AnIlu Anwid Anwhiq;
jugu jugu eyko vysu ]30]
He is from the Beginning of time, without any
numbering, without any beginning, without death. Through different Ages of
Time, He’s the same.
There are other meanings too of this pauri,
but I do not want to go in much detail, will cover it while translating the tika
of Jap Ji Sahib.
After reading the article further, I got to
know the author is nothing but a lunatic Hindu (not referring to all the people
of the faith, but this one only) who believes in the goddesses and thinks that
the Sikh religion teaches the same. She must be one of those fanatics who
translate Ram word to Ram Chandar ji, which most certainly she is as she
mentioned about Gobind and the meaning.
I literally was thinking it’s going to be
something different than that, because I am already writing about a lunatic
Hindu with the name of Ajit Vadakayil and encountering another one is really a
headache. I don’t know when these senseless creatures will understand that
Sikhism is not Hinduism. If you’ve the knowledge of Hinduism, doesn’t mean you
know Sikhism. If the same terms are there in different religions, they can mean
different meanings.
She further stated that the author that wrote
the English translation that we talked about earlier in the article was nothing
more than a Khalistani sympathiser who doesn’t want to have any Hindu
resemblance to the Sikh scriptures. Damn, you goat. If you have read whole Guru
Granth Sahib ji and Dasam Guru Granth Sahib ji and the history, you would have
been humiliated to such a level that you would be ashamed of your life and the
days spent in the cult of this woman who has zero knowledge of Sikhi.
This article of hers goes back to 2009. I
wish I had started writing earlier to clear the doubts of the people on the
Internet. But I am happy that I am writing it now to put these lunatics where
they belong.
Next she translate the following shabad:
mwrU
mhlw 4 ] isD smwiD jipE ilv lweI swiDk muin jipAw ]
jqI
sqI sMqoKI iDAwieAw muiK ieMdRwidk rivAw ]
srix
pry jipE qy Bwey gurmuiK pwir pieAw ]1]
myry
mn nwmu jpq qirAw ] DMnw jtu bwlmIku btvwrw gurmuiK pwir pieAw ]1]
rhwau
] suir nr gx gMDrby jipE iriK bpurY hir gwieAw ]
sMkir
bRhmY dyvI jipE muiK hir hir nwmu jipAw ]
hir
hir nwim ijnw mnu BInw qy gurmuiK pwir pieAw ]2]
koit
koit qyqIs iDAwieE hir jpiqAw AMqu n pwieAw ]
byd
purwx isimRiq hir jipAw muiK pMifq hir gwieAw ]
nwmu
rswlu ijnw min visAw qy gurmuiK pwir pieAw ]3]
Anq
qrMgI nwmu ijn jipAw mY gxq n kir sikAw ]
goibdu
ik®pw kry Qwie pwey jo hir pRB min BwieAw ]
guir
Dwir ik®pw hir nwmu idRVwieE jn nwnk nwmu lieAw ]4]2]
Angels, men, heavenly heralds and
celestial singers, meditate on Her; Even the humble Rishis sing of the Divine
Mother.
Shiva, Brahma and the goddess
Lakhshmi, meditate, and chant with their mouths the Name of the Divine Mother.
Those minds drenched with the Name
of the Divine Mother, cross over.
Millions and millions,
thirty-three million gods, meditate on Her; Countless are those who meditate on
the Divine Mother.
The Vedas, the Puraanas and the
Simritees meditate on Her; The Pandits, the religious scholars, sing Her
Praises as well.
Whenever it’s talked about Waheguru, she
represented it with a ‘She’ than a ‘He.’ Although I really don’t have a problem
with that, but when she says that it’s a woman, I have a problem. I can’t
understand how Akaal Shakti will be a woman and Waheguru is formless! It
doesn’t add up.
You don’t need to be genius to know it. You
just need to use your brain and stop listening to these cults. The word Gobind
is also there in the shabad. In one of the paragraphs, she said Gobind
is for Krishan, if that were true, how it could be Divine Mother? That doesn’t
add up. I know feminism is at its core to prove that men have the privileges
and they don’t. They are ready to talk some stupid arguments just to prove their
points. I am not against feminism but baseless arguments like this cult’s members
who are trying to have Waheguru half-female and half-male.
At last when the logic left her and the brain
filled with cow-dung, she writes another argument to prove her point. This time
it’s Jaap Sahib, from Dasam Guru Granth Sahib ji, written by Guru Gobind Singh
ji. She ignored all the verses in the bani, although the full translation
was there on their website, but focused on the word ‘jag maata.’
Jaap Sahib starts from the following chandd:
ckR ichn Aru brn jwiq Aru pwiq nihn ijh ]
rUp rMg Aru ryK ByK koaU kih n skiq ikh ]
Acl mUriq AnBau pRkws Aimqoij kih`jY ]
koit ieMdR ieMdRwix swih swhwix gixjY ]
iqRBvx mhIp sur nr Asur nyq nyq bn iqRx khq ]
qÍ srb nwm kQY kvn krm nwm brnq sumiq ]1]
The first chandd clearly states that
Waheguru doesn’t have any body, colour, religion, cast, and lines on palm. It’s
even said that Waheguru is Parkash Saroop. And all the names that are going to
be said are the Karam Naam, meaning the names given to Waheguru for His doings.
Like He shows mercy, He’s called Merciful; He kills everyone, so called Kaal;
He doesn’t have any specific name, so called Anaame.
Likewise, He nurtures the world with His
Shakti, so called Jag Maata. There is another verse that we can take for an
example from Bachitar Natak.
srb kwl hY ipqw hmwrw
] dyib kwlkw mwq hmwrw
]
Many so-called Sikhs who are against Dasam
Bani will discuss this verse from Bachitar Natak that a goddess is called the
Mother. Same is true with this cult who has no knowledge of gurbani. I
really don’t want to say Waheguru is a He or She, but if you check the
highlighted words above, they do not imply that they’re representing a
woman/goddess. Guru Gobind Singh ji called Waheguru is Father and His Shakti
his mother but didn’t say that it’s a woman and Waheguru is a man. No, it’s
against the Sikh religion. Waheguru doesn’t have any form.
qum
mwq ipqw hm bwirk qyry ] qumrI ik®pw mih sUK Gnyry ] – AMg 268
qUM
myrw ipqw qUMhY myrw mwqw ] qUM myrw bMDpu qUM myrw BRwqw ] – AMg 103
Even in the above verses, Waheguru is called both Mother and
Father. It’s not said to have any form or body. Same is what’s mentioned in
Bachitar Natak and Jaap Sahib. Waheguru is formless. The first step to adopt Sikhism
is to know that Waheguru doesn’t have any form, and the cult is deciding it’s
not one but two forms. 😐
Here is advise to the cult members of Nirmala Devi, you want to
believe that Shakti is a female, you can. No-one will utter a word against it.
Because it’s your faith, you can do anything. You want to make a pig your god,
you can. No issues. Why anyone will have an issue with what you believe in? The
complications come when you push your theory on other religions to prove your
point. Is it because your Nirmala Devi can’t have her own theory validated without
taking the help from other religious scriptures? I think she can’t, otherwise
she would have not said such gibberish things.
Secondly, if you are going to talk about Sikhism or the Sikh
scriptures, first read gurbani and clear your doubts. I think this
three-article series will be enough for you guys to shut your mouth from where
the words like ‘woman’ and ‘man’ come to refer to Waheguru. Create your own god
(I know it doesn’t make sense, but just for the argument), talk about your own
beliefs given to you by your Nirmala Devi, but do not, I say DO NOT bring Sikhism
in your cult to support your theories.
At last, I have said it earlier too, but let me say it again, it’s
just a style of writing if God can be referred to a He or a She, but God is
none of them, so you can write whatever you want. But never try to prove, if
you are talking about Sikhism, that Waheguru is a half-woman and half-man. I
rest my article here and conclude the following.
1.
This cult has no understanding of Sikhism.
2.
Waheguru is neither a female nor male.
3.
‘Eka Maayi’ pauri can’t be understood if ‘jugat’ and ‘veayi’
words are ignored.
4.
Guru Gobind Singh ji didn’t worship any goddess.
5.
The combined IQ of all the members of the cult is less than a three-year-old.
6.
Guru Nanak Dev ji was Waheguru Himself.
7.
Nirmala Devi is no Akaal Shakti.
8.
Waheguru and Akaal Shakti are not two but one form.
9.
Bhagauti is no goddess.
10.
At last, your cult needs a leader with a brain.
