A
|
jit Vadakayil, a blogger who goes with the same blog name, has written many articles over many things. People read his blog with so much certainty that whatever he’s written is true and can be believed just because it’s some elements that convince them. The first thing that needs to be understood is the mentality of the person who claims to know many things without giving any proof. The falsification of the stories that he’s written can be seen from the words that he chooses while writing and sometimes the contradictions to his own statements. A person with a brain can easily see through the lies that have been written on Ajit Vadakayil’s blog.
Before moving to the assumptions made by the blogger about Sikhism, we should first discuss the different categories of people around the world who have failed to understand Sikhism and its core beliefs.
1. People who believe that Sikhism is part of Hinduism as many words in Guru Granth Sahib ji resemble with what the Vedas and Shastras talk about.
2. People who believe that Sikhism was influenced by Hinduism because of the saints that Guru Nanak Dev ji had met in his early life.
3. People who claim that Sikhism was influenced/copied from Islam as Islam talks about one God, not many like in Hinduism (some say that God is one but in multiple forms, especially in Hinduism, just saying.)
4. People who say Sikhism is an amalgamation of Hinduism and Islam.
Many Sikhs have understood that their claims are false and without any logic. Over the years, people have given the proof and talked in length on the above-mentioned points. Even in the times of Guru Sahibaans, some knowledgeable pandits debated with the Sikh Gurus to convince them that their belief system was superior than what Guru Sahibaans were teaching. We have a perfect example of Guru Nanak Dev ji’s time when Guru Nanak Dev ji went to a mountain to talk with the Sidhs – people who believe in asanas and believe that God can be seen or Oneness can be achieved by controlling the breathing or concentrating just on breathing. We have path of Sidh Ghostt in Guru Granth Sahib ji, and Jap Ji Sahib is also the conversation between Guru Nanak Dev ji and the Sidhs.
Everything was getting as good as it should be. Questions were raised, answers were given. Normal. Now comes the interesting part when Ajit Vadakayil wrote an article back in 2013, the date on the blog is 6th July 2013.
Whenever you want to convince someone with false claims, you have to bring forward some convincing lies about the history. It’s new and really interesting, if you ignore the real history and gurbani. People start following it as if it were true. I have a friend who happens to be a follower of the blog and shares Ajit Vadakayil’s articles on social media because he’s been convinced by his articles. It’s sad to say that he’s a Sikh and he believes that the Sikh Gurus were Hindus just because the blogger has written it. This is what has been happening to us – we don’t read gurbani and history written by the gursikhs but adopt the ideology of the Internet strugglers who are trying their best to prove Sikhs are Hindus.
Our history is written by so many gursikhs, few of them are Bhai Santokh Singh ji, Bhai Sukha Singh ji, Giani Gian Singh ji, Bhai Ratan Singh Bhanggu. And the gursikhs who wrote books about Sikhi, including some history too, Bhai Kahn Singh Nabha, Giani Ditt Singh, Bhai Vir Singh, Bhagat Puran Singh, Giani Sant Singh Maskeen, Bhai Pinderpal Singh ji, etc. How many of us have read the books written by these gursikhs? Very few.
There can be some verses in the granths, which talk about history, that are not according to gurmat, that can be ignored, but ignoring the whole granth will be a sign of burying our own history. Gurbani, history and baana are the three things which are very dear to Sikhs. Our whole religion is based on these three things, and over the centuries people have been trying to destroy all of them, including Sikhs too – the double-agents actually.
Before we debunk the claims of the blogger, let me bring to you the ideology behind the article written by Ajit Vadakayil. It’s a very old trick and known as divide and rule. The very first part of the article starts to hold the attention of the readers by saying ‘BEWARE-- IT WILL BE FAKE HISTORY -- AIMED TO PRODUCE DESH DROHIS.’ A person living in India who has a great respect for the country and the diverse cultures will be captivated to know if someone/something is doing something against the country to produce traitors. How many patriots will say that it’s okay to be a traitor to a country? None.
More than half of the readers will hold their grounds to know more about the people who are dividing India. And then will start the lies and more lies to convince the people about the fake history. If we weigh the words written by Ajit Vadakayil for this specific article about Sikhs, you will find so many contradictions in the article. Not only this, but all the articles on the blog. Here, our focus will be to know the false stories and claims made by him so that our history can’t be smudged and we know what our history is and what gurbani teaches us.
I think we have diverted from our conversation. Let’s go back to the uniqueness of that blogger’s article to convince the readers.
The name of the article is ‘UNKNOWN HISTORY OF SIKHS AND SIKHISM , PAWNS IN DIVIDE AND RULE POLICY OF BRITISH EMPIRE’ and can be found here. (I will try to provide as many links/verses as possible to tell why the article is a sham.)
You can read the article first there and then read it here or do vice-versa. It depends on you. But most of you who have reached to this article might already have read the article written by Ajit Vadakayil.
The article seems to be written by an eight-year-old boy who didn’t have a sketch book to draw a sketch so thought of writing something to get good marks at school. Really, not funny, I have a reason to believe that. And the reason is that the article has so many false things. A person who claims to write ‘UNKNOWN HISTORY OF SIKHS AND SIKHISM’ must provide some irrefutable evidence to hold his points true, which is not the case here.
When he finds it impossible to give evidence, his words would be as sham as the article saying that the British changed the history of Sikhs and the holy scriptures of Sikhs, so you will never find it written anywhere. But if the history is changed and Ajit Vadakayil was born after 1947, after the British left India, how he happened to know this if everything was changed by the British? Doesn’t make sense. Even if we think that whatever he’s claiming is true or can be to some point believable, he should give some references to a book or something, and later we have to ask ourselves why that can be trusted, I mean the book, and who wrote the book, how he gathered the information. These are all the basic questions that come in mind when we talk about history. It should not be some false story and then say ‘the history was changed so you should believe what I’m writing.’ No.
History doesn’t work in that way.
Now let’s discuss a false story here. It’s from Ramayana. I’m not writing this to hurt someone’s feelings but to tell why it won’t make any sense to claim something to be true without giving any source. Sorry, if it is going to hurt you.
“Ramchandra’s father knew that his wife will ask for Rama’s exile so that Bharat could rule the kingdom. Dasharatha didn’t want to do that but he’s the person who would keep his promise. Lakshman was very upset of that. He wanted to have the rule for himself, not for Bharat or Ramchandra. He talked with his father and Sumitra, his mother, to give him the rule of the kingdom. They didn’t agree. He went on saying that if he doesn’t get it, he will kill both Bharat and Ramchandra.
“Dasharatha was very angry with him and told him that there would be repercussion of that and he would be amputated in front of everyone. Lakshman didn’t listen to his father and tell that he would be going with his brother Ramchandra and his wife. Before going out with them, he talked with his father at night and told him that he would kill both Ramchandra and Sita and then will return to kill Bharat and claim his throne by throwing him in jail. He left with Ramchandra later. Dasharatha knew that Lakshman was as good at keeping his words as he was, so he jumped over the wall and killed himself.”
Now, let’s justify this story by saying ‘All the different Ramayanas that you see now are all corrupted. The British changed the whole history of Hinduism and didn’t let us keep the real history. This is the true history that you can’t find anywhere.’ Simple. This is how the article on Sikhism was written by Ajit Vadakayil. Write a story, claim it to be true, and then spread some true events to convince that everything else is true.
Let’s go in details about the points made by Ajit Vadakayil.
1. ‘BEWARE-- IT WILL BE FAKE HISTORY -- AIMED TO PRODUCE DESH DROHIS.’ – This we have discussed. To tell some patriots about a fake story or something that’s not true but is against something that they hold near to their heart, it’s the best option to start a war of words.
It’s been seen especially in the last decade that now people don’t have anything to blame, so they come with new stories; how some Khalistanis are trying to divide India or planning to do so. The problem is that if a country has some powers working against it, it will try to destroy that at any cost. There is no doubt in that that in Canada and England there are Sikhs who hold the key positions in the government and they have their own opinions about the innocent Sikhs who got killed back in ’90s in Punjab, and those opinions are not same as what the Government of India believed. They will definitely detest that. To have them stand down or to convince people that they can’t be trusted, some false stories are published by the media houses.
Sikhs are very hard-working people and they have shown themselves to the world what they truly are. There was a ban on wearing kirpan in England, that was lifted too and Sikhs are still trying in France to wear turbans on their heads. In recent news, Canada has allowed Sikhs to wear kirpans on plane. All these series of incidents are not digested by those who want to keep Sikhs only in one country, so destroy the history and true meaning of gurbani by writing online articles or by showing on some media channels that how Sikhs are planning against India. (I am here in no way saying that some Sikhs are not demanding a different land. India got its independence by doing the same thing. Sometimes you can’t control the revolution, doesn’t matter who you are or what powers you have.)
This is how to control the masses. There was an operation in the US known as Operation Mockingbird back in the early ‘50s to control masses by manipulating the media houses for brainwashing purposes. The same is done by many countries with/without some serious involvement of the secret agencies.
And the incident that got the author of the article to write the line ‘AIMED TO PRODUCE DESH DROHIS’ is the fact that in England/(other countries) there are books on Sikhism – the real history, not the fake one that is getting written by Ajit Vadakayil – which are exposing the claims of Ajit Vadakayil.
2. ‘Check out the Sikh hand in the picture above-- restraining the Muslim hand .’ – There are two groups, actually non-Sikh groups, that tell two different stories. First one says that Sikhs saved Hindus at the time of the Mughal Empire, gives the example of the sacrifice of Guru Teg Bahadur ji to save Kashmiri Pandits. On the other hand, there is a fringe group that claims that Sikhs didn’t do anything for Hindus; Marathas and Rajputs fought against the Mughals and protected their own women. The Maratha Empire has a great history, some very brave warriors were born and fought against other forces. But trying to bring forward that part of the history and ignoring the Sikh history of protecting the Hindus insinuates how people could be ignorant while trying to justify history.
There are hundreds of incidents when Sikhs protected the women who were taken by the Mughals to sell in the brothels of Ghazni. Baba Deep Singh ji fought with the Mughals to free 10,000 women and asked Singhs to send the women to their houses. This was the character of the Khalsa; not like asking/giving the women to expand the territories. Won’t go more than that, otherwise some people will get offended to know how their kings gave the women to the enemies to save themselves.
3. ‘Before 1699 there was NO Sikhism at all.’ – There is another falsifying thing about this article, and most of the article revolves around it to convince how the first nine Sikh Gurus were Hindu.
Let’s start.
There are two years in the history of Sikhs that are very important. First one is 1469 and the second one is 1699. 1469 was the year when Guru Nanak Dev ji was born and this is the year when Sikhism was started. How?
Starting of a religion is the time when the person is enlightened or born or starts preaching. In Christians, the year when Christianity was started was the year of the birth of Jesus Christ. In Islam, the year when Prophet Mohammad was born or the time when he’s enlightened was the year of the beginning of Islam (there are some scholars too who say that the first person who was born was a Muslim i.e. Adam, and some even claim Jesus Christ to be a Muslim according to the new definition of Islam which says that if you submit to Allah, you are a Muslim. Let’s not go there and have our discussion on the current topic.) In Hinduism, there is no specific time or person who started the religion. Hinduism itself is a word that you can’t see in the scriptures of Hindus. This was a name given by the Persians. So, the name which is there in the Hindu scriptures is ‘Sanatan Dharama.’
The problem with people these days is that they claim that their religion is the oldest religion of the world and the first person who was born or evolved was a person who belonged to that specific religion. It sounds so insane that I laugh sometimes when people make these claims. That can hold true for them, no doubt in that. When you try to convince someone, it should be to a broader level; you can give examples from your religions to talk about your religion, but trying to talk about history that is not convincing will be false.
My take on Hinduism is, no offence to anyone, that Hinduism or Sanatan Dharma is a collection of cultures or religions. You can’t find it to be a centric religion. It’s like a culture, not a religion though. Some claim it to be a way of life and tell that there is no specific word in English that can be equivalent to ‘Dharma.’ All the stories that have no base. Then there are so many scriptures in Hinduism, sometimes they are totally different from each other. From that, I assume that it has to be a collection of something that people practised thousands of years ago, not a centric religion that can tell you what needs to be done but tell you different ways of doing something. And this take of mine is totally without any offence to any person who practises the religion. But just saying as we are going to discuss so many things about Hinduism because the blogger has written so many things in his article to have a conclusion that the Sikh Gurus were Hindus.
Coming back to 1469 year. This was the starting of Sikhism. And there was no enlightened year or someone who influenced Guru Nanak Dev ji. Guru Nanak Dev ji Himself was Waheguru, and Waheguru doesn’t need someone to tell Him what to do. But in the lives of Guru Sahibaans, you will see so few examples that tell us that the Sikh Gurus’ all-powerful nature was showed to the people. They didn’t do that to gather the people around them like the Sidhs were doing at that time.
When we are talking about Guru Nanak Dev ji, it’s necessary to talk about the claims of some people who say that Guru Nanak Dev ji’s guru was Sant Reinn ji (I’m sure you have heard the sakhi of 20 rupees.) There Guru Nanak Dev ji met Sant Reinn ji and talked to him and gave food. People who follow Sant Reinn they say that he was the guru of Guru Nanak Dev ji, no. When we read Suraj Parkash we see the real truth behind it. Here are the lines:
ਭਯੋ ਅਸਹਿ ਮੁਝ ਤੇਜ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਊ । ਯਾਂਤੇ ਦੀਨੀ ਜਾਨਿ ਰਜਾਊ ।
ਅਸ ਕਹਿ ਤਬ ਕੀਨੋ ਪੁਨ ਅਸਨਾ । ਖਾਨ ਲਗੇ ਸ੍ਵਾਦਨ ਤੇ ਰਸਨਾ ॥੫॥
ਅਸ ਕਹਿ ਤਬ ਕੀਨੋ ਪੁਨ ਅਸਨਾ । ਖਾਨ ਲਗੇ ਸ੍ਵਾਦਨ ਤੇ ਰਸਨਾ ॥੫॥
Before giving the translation of these lines, let’s talk about the background of the story. When Guru Nanak Dev ji gave food to Sant Reinn ji and asked that he could serve them too, Sant Reinn ji said that you could go, we would do it ourselves. And when the followers of Sant Rein ji asked him why you sent Guru Nanak Dev ji away, these were the verses that he said. Here is the translation:
‘The Divine Light from him was so intense. I couldn’t sit in front of that (meaning the light inside Guru Nanak Dev ji was so bright and intense that it’s hard to sit in front of him) and told him to go.
By saying this, he sat on his seat. And start eating the delicious food.’
Here is the video on our YouTube channel about it – Was Sant Reinn Guru Nanak Dev ji’s guru?
This is the truth with proof from the scripture, not some made-up story. This is the reason why people will always find a reason to tell not to read the old historic granths of Sikhs, because all the nonsense talks that they do about the history of Sikhs are debunked by the granths; and say that they were influenced by the British or are against gurmat. If there is something that contradicts with gurbani, we can always say that it’s wrong because this is not right according to gurbani. But we can’t ignore the whole granth. People like Jeonwala, Kala Afghana, Darshu and the people who follow them they are having this task in hand to stop Sikhs reading gurbani and old granths. BEWARE OF THESE IDIOTS.
1469 was the year when Guru Nanak Dev ji was born and started Sikhism. From the life of Guru Nanak Dev ji and the gurbani, we can always see that Guru Nanak Dev ji was neither a Hindu nor Muslim as claimed by some people. Will write a post on that later, but will give some examples here.
1. When Guru Nanak Dev ji was asked to wear a janeu, Guru Nanak Dev ji said following verses to the pandit.
ਦਇਆ ਕਪਾਹ ਸੰਤੋਖੁ ਸੂਤੁ ਜਤੁ ਗੰਢੀ ਸਤੁ ਵਟੁ ॥
ਏਹੁ ਜਨੇਊ ਜੀਅ ਕਾ ਹਈ ਤ ਪਾਡੇ ਘਤੁ ॥
ਨਾ ਏਹੁ ਤੁਟੈ ਨ ਮਲੁ ਲਗੈ ਨਾ ਏਹੁ ਜਲੈ ਨ ਜਾਇ ॥
ਧੰਨੁ ਸੁ ਮਾਣਸ ਨਾਨਕਾ ਜੋ ਗਲਿ ਚਲੇ ਪਾਇ ॥
ਚਉਕੜਿ ਮੁਲਿ ਅਣਾਇਆ ਬਹਿ ਚਉਕੈ ਪਾਇਆ ॥
ਸਿਖਾ ਕੰਨਿ ਚੜਾਈਆ ਗੁਰੁ ਬ੍ਰਾਹਮਣੁ ਥਿਆ॥
ਓਹੁ ਮੁਆ ਓਹੁ ਝੜਿ ਪਇਆ ਵੇਤਗਾ ਗਇਆ॥੧॥ – ਅੰਗ ੪੭੧
2. The following shabad was said in a very young age when Guru Nanak Dev ji was sent to a Maulvi to learn Farsi. The name of the Maulvi was Kutabdeen.
ਯਕ ਅਰਜ ਗੁਫਤਮ ਪੇਸਿ ਤੋ ਦਰ ਗੋਸ ਕੁਨ ਕਰਤਾਰ ॥
ਹਕਾ ਕਬੀਰ ਕਰੀਮ ਤੂ ਬੇਐਬ ਪਰਵਦਗਾਰ ॥੧॥
These incidents happened before 20-rupee sakhi of Guru Nanak Dev ji. Now if we believe that Guru Nanak Dev ji’s guru was Sant Reinn ji, how Guru Nanak Dev ji happened to know these verses or divine words?
Anyways, the conclusion of telling all these things is that Sikhism was started back in 1469, not 1699. And Guru Nanak Dev ji’s guru was no man, and neither he was influence by Hinduism or Islam or some Bhakti Movement.
Now let’s talk about 1699.
1699 was the year when the Khalsa Panth was created by Guru Gobind Singh ji. Ajit Vadakayil has not understood it so far that 1699 was the year of the creation of Khalsa, and 1469 was the year of the birth of Guru Nanak Dev ji and the starting of Sikhism.
Before 1699, Sikhs used to wear weapons too from the time of Guru Hargobind Sahib ji, the sixth guru, after the martyrdom of Guru Arjan Dev ji, the fifth guru. Guru Hargobind Sahib ji fought battles with the Mughals.
· Battle of Amritsar
· Battle of Gurusar
· Battle of Kartarpur
· Battle of Hargobindpur
People who claim that the Khalsa Panth was created to protect only Hindus from Muslims don’t make any sense. Maybe they don’t know the real history or the reason behind the creation of the Khalsa Panth. The very basic question that comes in mind is if they believe that the Khalsa Panth was created to protect only Hindus, then by saying this, are they saying the Hindus were not saved before Guru Gobind Singh ji created the Khalsa Panth? What about the sacrifice of Guru Teg Bahadur ji? What about the Hindus who were saved at the time of Guru Hargobind Sahib ji and Guru Har Rai ji?
All the false stories on the Internet are so confusing and misleading that people who write them should be very stupid to even think to write them.
Just to clarify why the Khalsa Panth was created, let’s take the verses from Guru Gobind Singh ji’s writing in Dasam Guru Granth Sahib.
ਤਿਨ ਕੀ ਠਉਰ ਦੇਵਤਾ ਥਾਪੇ ॥
ਤੇ ਭੀ ਬਲ ਪੂਜਾ ਉਰਝਾਏ ॥ ਆਪਨ ਹੀ ਪ੍ਰਮੇਸਰ ਕਹਾਏ ॥੭॥
ਮਹਾਦੇਵ ਅਚੁੱਤ ਕਹਵਾਯੋ ॥ ਬਿਸਨ ਆਪ ਹੀ ਕੋ ਠਹਿਰਾਯੋ ॥
ਬ੍ਰਹਮਾ ਆਪ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮ ਬਖਾਨਾ ॥ ਪ੍ਰਭ ਕੋ ਪ੍ਰਭੂ ਨ ਕਿਨਹੂੰ ਜਾਨਾ ॥੮॥
ਕੇਤੇ ਸੂਰ ਚੰਦ ਕਹੁ ਮਾਨੈ ॥ ਅਗਨ ਹੋਤ੍ਰ ਕਈ ਪਵਨ ਪ੍ਰਮਾਨੈ ॥੧੦॥
ਕਿਨਹੂੰ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਪਾਹਨ ਪਹਿਚਾਨਾ ॥ ਨਾਤਿ ਕਿਤੇ ਜਲ ਕਰਤ ਬਿਧਾਨਾ ॥
ਕੇਤਕ ਕਰਮ ਕਰਤ ਡਰਪਾਨਾ ॥ ਧਰਮਰਾਜ ਕੋ ਧਰਮ ਪਛਾਨਾ ॥੧੧॥
ਤਬ ਹਰਿ ਸਿੱਧ ਸਾਧ ਠਹਿਰਾਏ ॥ ਤਿਨ ਭੀ ਪਰਮ ਪੁਰਖ ਨਹੀ ਪਾਏ ॥
ਜੇ ਕੋਈ ਹੋਤ ਭਯੋ ਜਗਿ ਸਿਆਨਾ ॥ ਤਿਨ ਤਿਨ ਅਪਨੋ ਪੰਥੁ ਚਲਾਨਾ ॥੧੪॥
ਤੇ ਭੀ ਬਲ ਪੂਜਾ ਉਰਝਾਏ ॥ ਆਪਨ ਹੀ ਪ੍ਰਮੇਸਰ ਕਹਾਏ ॥੭॥
ਮਹਾਦੇਵ ਅਚੁੱਤ ਕਹਵਾਯੋ ॥ ਬਿਸਨ ਆਪ ਹੀ ਕੋ ਠਹਿਰਾਯੋ ॥
ਬ੍ਰਹਮਾ ਆਪ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮ ਬਖਾਨਾ ॥ ਪ੍ਰਭ ਕੋ ਪ੍ਰਭੂ ਨ ਕਿਨਹੂੰ ਜਾਨਾ ॥੮॥
ਕੇਤੇ ਸੂਰ ਚੰਦ ਕਹੁ ਮਾਨੈ ॥ ਅਗਨ ਹੋਤ੍ਰ ਕਈ ਪਵਨ ਪ੍ਰਮਾਨੈ ॥੧੦॥
ਕਿਨਹੂੰ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਪਾਹਨ ਪਹਿਚਾਨਾ ॥ ਨਾਤਿ ਕਿਤੇ ਜਲ ਕਰਤ ਬਿਧਾਨਾ ॥
ਕੇਤਕ ਕਰਮ ਕਰਤ ਡਰਪਾਨਾ ॥ ਧਰਮਰਾਜ ਕੋ ਧਰਮ ਪਛਾਨਾ ॥੧੧॥
ਤਬ ਹਰਿ ਸਿੱਧ ਸਾਧ ਠਹਿਰਾਏ ॥ ਤਿਨ ਭੀ ਪਰਮ ਪੁਰਖ ਨਹੀ ਪਾਏ ॥
ਜੇ ਕੋਈ ਹੋਤ ਭਯੋ ਜਗਿ ਸਿਆਨਾ ॥ ਤਿਨ ਤਿਨ ਅਪਨੋ ਪੰਥੁ ਚਲਾਨਾ ॥੧੪॥
Then I created Devtas (deities) to replace them.
By showing their powers, even they started their own worshipping. And started calling themselves God. ||7||
Shiv ji started calling himself God. Vishnu started saying he is God.
Brahma started calling himself God. Nobody was worshipping God but deities. ||8||
So many people worshipped Sun and Moon. Some are doing worshipping of Fire by doing yajna and some worshipping Air. ||10||
Some believed God is in stones. Some believed bathing at the religious places is great.
So many people are doing these things just because they are afraid. And they called Dharamraj their religion. ||11||
Then Sidhs were sent on earth. None of them understood God.
If someone got the understanding of God. They started their own Panth. ||14|
When all the people who were sent on the earth didn’t start the panth of Waheguru, Guru Gobind Singh ji was asked by God. (Mind you, Guru Gobind Singh ji also said that there is no difference between all the Sikh Gurus who were born before him; and they all were the roop of Waheguru. And same is true for Guru Gobind Singh ji. Thought of clearing this thing as some people are there who don’t know much about Dasam Guru Granth Sahib and start claiming false things.)
ਮੈ ਅਪਨਾ ਸੁਤ ਤੋਹਿ ਨਿਵਾਜਾ ॥ ਪੰਥੁ ਪ੍ਰਚੁਰ ਕਰਬੇ ਕਹੁ ਸਾਜਾ ॥
ਜਾਹਿ ਤਹਾਂ ਤੈ ਧਰਮੁ ਚਲਾਇ ॥ ਕੁਬੁਧਿ ਕਰਨ ਤੇ ਲੋਕ ਹਟਾਇ ॥੨੯॥
ਜਾਹਿ ਤਹਾਂ ਤੈ ਧਰਮੁ ਚਲਾਇ ॥ ਕੁਬੁਧਿ ਕਰਨ ਤੇ ਲੋਕ ਹਟਾਇ ॥੨੯॥
In the next verses, Guru Gobind Singh ji said why he came in this world. Let’s see if he says it’s just to protect only Hindus from Muslims as said by fake scholars/bloggers.
ਹਮ ਇਹ ਕਾਜ ਜਗਤ ਮੋ ਆਏ ॥ ਧਰਮ ਹੇਤ ਗੁਰਦੇਵ ਪਠਾਏ ॥
ਜਹਾਂ ਤਹਾਂ ਤੁਮ ਧਰਮ ਬਿਥਾਰੋ ॥ ਦੁਸਟ ਦੋਖੀਯਨਿ ਪਕਰਿ ਪਛਾਰੋ ॥੪੨॥
ਯਾਹੀ ਕਾਜ ਧਰਾ ਹਮ ਜਨਮੰ ॥ ਸਮਝਿ ਲੇਹੁ ਸਾਧੂ ਸਭ ਮਨਮੰ ॥
ਧਰਮ ਚਲਾਵਨ ਸੰਤ ਉਬਾਰਨ ॥ ਦੁਸਟ ਸਭਨ ਕੋ ਮੂਲ ਉਪਾਰਨਿ ॥੪੩॥
ਜਹਾਂ ਤਹਾਂ ਤੁਮ ਧਰਮ ਬਿਥਾਰੋ ॥ ਦੁਸਟ ਦੋਖੀਯਨਿ ਪਕਰਿ ਪਛਾਰੋ ॥੪੨॥
ਯਾਹੀ ਕਾਜ ਧਰਾ ਹਮ ਜਨਮੰ ॥ ਸਮਝਿ ਲੇਹੁ ਸਾਧੂ ਸਭ ਮਨਮੰ ॥
ਧਰਮ ਚਲਾਵਨ ਸੰਤ ਉਬਾਰਨ ॥ ਦੁਸਟ ਸਭਨ ਕੋ ਮੂਲ ਉਪਾਰਨਿ ॥੪੩॥
For this work I came in the word. Waheguru/God sent me here.
Spread the righteousness everywhere. People who are doing bad things and killing innocents, fight with them to stop them. ||42||
I came in the world for this. Understand this in your mind, all the saints.
I am here to spread the panth of Waheguru and save saints. And to stop the evil people. ||43||
Nowhere I saw Guru Gobind Singh ji talking about saving only Hindus from Muslims. These so-called stories are spread by those who don’t want to tell the truth to people. The Khalsa Panth was created to fight against injustice, not to fight against Muslims.
In India, there has been a continuous growth of hatred these days towards Muslims by calling them to go to Pakistan; or they are just invaders and all. This is the root cause of hatred that we see these days. People even go and say Muslims killed two Sikh Gurus and you shouldn’t be polite with them. They want Sikhs to be like them – idiot, illogical and hostile.
Just to summarise the two years, here it is:
· 1469: The year of the birth of Guru Nanak Dev ji and beginning of Sikhism.
· 1699: The year of the creation of Khalsa Panth.
There are only three points that we’ve discussed and it consumed 15 pages of my Microsoft Word. Anyways, it’s going to be a long series and will consume so much of time to know about the truth. I will post here as we move along it. You can also watch our expose of Ajit Vadakayil on the following link:
